Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses

IntroductionA protective humoral response to pathogens requires the development of high affinity antibodies in germinal centers (GC). The combination of antigens available during immunization has a strong impact on the strength and breadth of the antibody response. Antigens can display various level...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philippe A. Robert, Theinmozhi Arulraj, Michael Meyer-Hermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238046/full
_version_ 1797357791568986112
author Philippe A. Robert
Philippe A. Robert
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Michael Meyer-Hermann
Michael Meyer-Hermann
author_facet Philippe A. Robert
Philippe A. Robert
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Michael Meyer-Hermann
Michael Meyer-Hermann
author_sort Philippe A. Robert
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionA protective humoral response to pathogens requires the development of high affinity antibodies in germinal centers (GC). The combination of antigens available during immunization has a strong impact on the strength and breadth of the antibody response. Antigens can display various levels of immunogenicity, and a hierarchy of immunodominance arises when the GC response to an antigen dampens the response to other antigens. Immunodominance is a challenge for the development of vaccines to mutating viruses, and for the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies. The extent by which antigens with different levels of immunogenicity compete for the induction of high affinity antibodies and therefore contribute to immunodominance is not known.MethodsHere, we perform in silico simulations of the GC response, using a structural representation of antigens with complex surface amino acid composition and topology. We generate antigens with complex domains of different levels of immunogenicity and perform simulations with combinations of these domains.ResultsWe found that GC dynamics were driven by the most immunogenic domain and immunodominance arose as affinity maturation to less immunogenic domain was inhibited. However, this inhibition was moderate since the less immunogenic domain exhibited a weak GC response in the absence of the most immunogenic domain. Less immunogenic domains reduced the dominance of GC responses to more immunogenic domains, albeit at a later time point.DiscussionThe simulations suggest that increased vaccine valency may decrease immunodominance of the GC response to strongly immunogenic domains and therefore, act as a potential strategy for the natural induction of broadly neutralizing antibodies in GC reactions.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T14:50:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a6212b5a50a5482a911a812a65a24950
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T14:50:19Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-a6212b5a50a5482a911a812a65a249502024-01-11T04:25:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242024-01-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.12380461238046Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responsesPhilippe A. Robert0Philippe A. Robert1Theinmozhi Arulraj2Theinmozhi Arulraj3Michael Meyer-Hermann4Michael Meyer-Hermann5Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, GermanyDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, GermanyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDepartment of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, GermanyInstitute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, GermanyIntroductionA protective humoral response to pathogens requires the development of high affinity antibodies in germinal centers (GC). The combination of antigens available during immunization has a strong impact on the strength and breadth of the antibody response. Antigens can display various levels of immunogenicity, and a hierarchy of immunodominance arises when the GC response to an antigen dampens the response to other antigens. Immunodominance is a challenge for the development of vaccines to mutating viruses, and for the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies. The extent by which antigens with different levels of immunogenicity compete for the induction of high affinity antibodies and therefore contribute to immunodominance is not known.MethodsHere, we perform in silico simulations of the GC response, using a structural representation of antigens with complex surface amino acid composition and topology. We generate antigens with complex domains of different levels of immunogenicity and perform simulations with combinations of these domains.ResultsWe found that GC dynamics were driven by the most immunogenic domain and immunodominance arose as affinity maturation to less immunogenic domain was inhibited. However, this inhibition was moderate since the less immunogenic domain exhibited a weak GC response in the absence of the most immunogenic domain. Less immunogenic domains reduced the dominance of GC responses to more immunogenic domains, albeit at a later time point.DiscussionThe simulations suggest that increased vaccine valency may decrease immunodominance of the GC response to strongly immunogenic domains and therefore, act as a potential strategy for the natural induction of broadly neutralizing antibodies in GC reactions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238046/fullgerminal center (GC)agent-based model (ABM)vaccine modelimmunodominance (ID)antibodies
spellingShingle Philippe A. Robert
Philippe A. Robert
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Theinmozhi Arulraj
Michael Meyer-Hermann
Michael Meyer-Hermann
Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
Frontiers in Immunology
germinal center (GC)
agent-based model (ABM)
vaccine model
immunodominance (ID)
antibodies
title Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
title_full Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
title_fullStr Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
title_full_unstemmed Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
title_short Germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
title_sort germinal centers are permissive to subdominant antibody responses
topic germinal center (GC)
agent-based model (ABM)
vaccine model
immunodominance (ID)
antibodies
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238046/full
work_keys_str_mv AT philippearobert germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses
AT philippearobert germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses
AT theinmozhiarulraj germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses
AT theinmozhiarulraj germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses
AT michaelmeyerhermann germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses
AT michaelmeyerhermann germinalcentersarepermissivetosubdominantantibodyresponses