Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms

This study investigates the forms and uses of negative interrogatives with auxiliary verb contractions in English, focusing on syntactic and semantic differences. Data was drawn from conversations in an English class at a university in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia, between a lecturer and students and stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khalsiah Khalsiah, Burhanuddin Yasin, Muhammad Yusuf, Fatmawati Fatmawati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Syiah Kuala 2024-09-01
Series:Studies in English Language and Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/39866
_version_ 1826852632676794368
author Khalsiah Khalsiah
Burhanuddin Yasin
Muhammad Yusuf
Fatmawati Fatmawati
author_facet Khalsiah Khalsiah
Burhanuddin Yasin
Muhammad Yusuf
Fatmawati Fatmawati
author_sort Khalsiah Khalsiah
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the forms and uses of negative interrogatives with auxiliary verb contractions in English, focusing on syntactic and semantic differences. Data was drawn from conversations in an English class at a university in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia, between a lecturer and students and students and students. The aim was to examine three types of negative interrogatives: Yes-No questions, negative rhetorical questions, and both marked (n’t) and unmarked (not) forms. The research employs a descriptive method with a synchronic time frame, utilizing distributional analysis, including immediate constituent analysis and mark reading techniques, to categorize and analyze the data. The findings reveal that negative interrogatives involving auxiliary verbs exhibit positive and negative presuppositions, with adjectival negative interrogatives showing variations between contracted and uncontracted forms. Adverbial negative interrogatives were found across all three types, indicating their versatility in forming questions. The study highlights that the choice between ‘not’ and ‘n’t’ affects the tone and emphasis of negative interrogatives, influencing the interpretation of responses. Contracted forms often carry a rhetorical or presumptive tone, while uncontracted forms are more formal and explicit. These variations show the importance of auxiliary verbs and negative markers in shaping the structure and meaning of negative interrogatives. This research contributes to the understanding of how negative interrogatives function in English, revealing the nuanced ways in which they impact communication and interpretation.
first_indexed 2025-02-16T17:11:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a7f7a613f9f94b878650a7df3db0f664
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2355-2794
2461-0275
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-16T17:11:13Z
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Universitas Syiah Kuala
record_format Article
series Studies in English Language and Education
spelling doaj.art-a7f7a613f9f94b878650a7df3db0f6642025-01-28T10:47:39ZengUniversitas Syiah KualaStudies in English Language and Education2355-27942461-02752024-09-011131254126910.24815/siele.v11i3.3986618778Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted formsKhalsiah Khalsiah0Burhanuddin Yasin1Muhammad Yusuf2Fatmawati Fatmawati3Universitas MalikussalehUniversitas Syiah KualaUniveristas MalikussalehKesdam Iskandar MudaThis study investigates the forms and uses of negative interrogatives with auxiliary verb contractions in English, focusing on syntactic and semantic differences. Data was drawn from conversations in an English class at a university in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia, between a lecturer and students and students and students. The aim was to examine three types of negative interrogatives: Yes-No questions, negative rhetorical questions, and both marked (n’t) and unmarked (not) forms. The research employs a descriptive method with a synchronic time frame, utilizing distributional analysis, including immediate constituent analysis and mark reading techniques, to categorize and analyze the data. The findings reveal that negative interrogatives involving auxiliary verbs exhibit positive and negative presuppositions, with adjectival negative interrogatives showing variations between contracted and uncontracted forms. Adverbial negative interrogatives were found across all three types, indicating their versatility in forming questions. The study highlights that the choice between ‘not’ and ‘n’t’ affects the tone and emphasis of negative interrogatives, influencing the interpretation of responses. Contracted forms often carry a rhetorical or presumptive tone, while uncontracted forms are more formal and explicit. These variations show the importance of auxiliary verbs and negative markers in shaping the structure and meaning of negative interrogatives. This research contributes to the understanding of how negative interrogatives function in English, revealing the nuanced ways in which they impact communication and interpretation.https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/39866contractionnegative questionprimary auxiliary
spellingShingle Khalsiah Khalsiah
Burhanuddin Yasin
Muhammad Yusuf
Fatmawati Fatmawati
Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
Studies in English Language and Education
contraction
negative question
primary auxiliary
title Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
title_full Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
title_fullStr Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
title_full_unstemmed Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
title_short Syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives: Contracted vs. uncontracted forms
title_sort syntactic and semantic variations in negative interrogatives contracted vs uncontracted forms
topic contraction
negative question
primary auxiliary
url https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/39866
work_keys_str_mv AT khalsiahkhalsiah syntacticandsemanticvariationsinnegativeinterrogativescontractedvsuncontractedforms
AT burhanuddinyasin syntacticandsemanticvariationsinnegativeinterrogativescontractedvsuncontractedforms
AT muhammadyusuf syntacticandsemanticvariationsinnegativeinterrogativescontractedvsuncontractedforms
AT fatmawatifatmawati syntacticandsemanticvariationsinnegativeinterrogativescontractedvsuncontractedforms