What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The creation of Local Health Care Cooperatives (LHCCs) in Scotland in 1999 was typical of attempts to encourage voluntary integration and co-operation between health care providers. One of the three stated objectives of their introdu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sutton Matt, McLean Gary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/104
_version_ 1818058309172723712
author Sutton Matt
McLean Gary
author_facet Sutton Matt
McLean Gary
author_sort Sutton Matt
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The creation of Local Health Care Cooperatives (LHCCs) in Scotland in 1999 was typical of attempts to encourage voluntary integration and co-operation between health care providers. One of the three stated objectives of their introduction was to tackle inequalities and improve access to care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used administrative data on all general practices in 1999 and 2003 to examine whether LHCCs had any measurable impact on six indicators of practice resources and activity. We compare three groups (participant, non-participant, and ineligible practices) through regression analysis of changes over time in group means and within-group inequality (measured using Gini coefficients). In addition, for participants we measure changes in the variation between and within LHCCs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Despite having similar registered populations to participants, non-participants had lower levels of resources at the start of the period and this differential widened over time. The changes over time in the activity indicators were similar across the three groups. There was little evidence that inequality between LHCC practices narrowed more than in the other two groups. Practices within LHCCs appear to be become more homogenous while variation increased between LHCCs.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The mixed messages from our examination of resources and activity indicators demonstrates that there are likely to be important lessons to be learned from the brief experiment with LHCCs. Clear objectives that are evaluated using a battery of simple performance indicators may help to ensure demonstrable change in future initiatives to foster integration and co-operation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:58:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a875bc07e1ce4bcaa03095b7c5c43f77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:58:35Z
publishDate 2008-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-a875bc07e1ce4bcaa03095b7c5c43f772022-12-22T01:48:02ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-05-018110410.1186/1472-6963-8-104What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?Sutton MattMcLean Gary<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The creation of Local Health Care Cooperatives (LHCCs) in Scotland in 1999 was typical of attempts to encourage voluntary integration and co-operation between health care providers. One of the three stated objectives of their introduction was to tackle inequalities and improve access to care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used administrative data on all general practices in 1999 and 2003 to examine whether LHCCs had any measurable impact on six indicators of practice resources and activity. We compare three groups (participant, non-participant, and ineligible practices) through regression analysis of changes over time in group means and within-group inequality (measured using Gini coefficients). In addition, for participants we measure changes in the variation between and within LHCCs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Despite having similar registered populations to participants, non-participants had lower levels of resources at the start of the period and this differential widened over time. The changes over time in the activity indicators were similar across the three groups. There was little evidence that inequality between LHCC practices narrowed more than in the other two groups. Practices within LHCCs appear to be become more homogenous while variation increased between LHCCs.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The mixed messages from our examination of resources and activity indicators demonstrates that there are likely to be important lessons to be learned from the brief experiment with LHCCs. Clear objectives that are evaluated using a battery of simple performance indicators may help to ensure demonstrable change in future initiatives to foster integration and co-operation.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/104
spellingShingle Sutton Matt
McLean Gary
What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
BMC Health Services Research
title What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
title_full What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
title_fullStr What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
title_full_unstemmed What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
title_short What impact did the creation of Local Health Care Co-operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity?
title_sort what impact did the creation of local health care co operatives have on indicators of practice resources and activity
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/104
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonmatt whatimpactdidthecreationoflocalhealthcarecooperativeshaveonindicatorsofpracticeresourcesandactivity
AT mcleangary whatimpactdidthecreationoflocalhealthcarecooperativeshaveonindicatorsofpracticeresourcesandactivity