Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Single-Files Supplemental Retreatment considering Apical Patency Influence: In Vitro Study

Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Single-Files Supplemental Retreatment considering Apical Patency Influence: In Vitro Study

Objective. This study aims to assess the impact of re-establishing apical patency on the quantity of debris extruded through the apex after three supplementary retreatment files (TruNatomy (TRN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and XP endo Finisher R (XPFR)). Materials and Methods. Eighty single-rooted mandibul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Neveen Ali Shaheen, Nahla Gamaleldin Elhelbawy, Dalia Abdelhamid Sherif
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Hindawi Limited 2022-01-01
Series:	International Journal of Biomaterials
Online Access:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7544813

Similar Items

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris after Retreatment Procedure with ProTaper and Endostar Retreatment File Systems
by: Amit Jena, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Evaluation of apical debris extrusion and patency file in continuous and reciprocating rotary endodontic systems.
by: Tomas Bordagaray, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Evaluation of the apically extruded debris associated with the use of different single-file systems
by: Ozgur Genc Sen, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Investigating Apically Extruded Debris During Pulpectomy with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files
by: JK Sonia Bai, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

RECIPROC VERSUS TWISTED FILE FOR ROOT CANAL FILLING REMOVAL:ASSESSMENT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS*
by: Demet ALTUNBAŞ, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01)

Apical Patency or Apical Plug: A Literature Review
by: Durr-e-Sadaf, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

The Effect of Patency Files on Apical Canal Anatomy Using SEM Imaging
by: Michael S. Cavender, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Relationship between the size of patency file and apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite
by: Camoes Izabel, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation with Self-Adjusting File, Reciprocating File, and Rotary Files: An In Vitro Study
by: Pratik A. Burad, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris During Retreatment Procedures Using Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: An In Vitro Comparative Study
by: Luigi Generali, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

In vitro evaluation of filling material removal and apical debris extrusion after retreatment using Reciproc blue, Hyflex EDM and ProTaper retreatment files
by: Passent Abdelnaby, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Associated with Different Nickel–Titanium Systems
by: Özgür Uyanik, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

Assessment of Apical Microleakage in Root Canal Treated Teeth with or without Apical Patency
by: m - Aminozarbian, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01)

Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Using Different Endodontic Instrumentation systems.
by: Saif Nadhim Hassoon
Published: (2022-03-01)

A Comparative Evaluation of the Apically Extruded Debris from Root Canals Prepared by R-Motion NiTi File System
by: Farah B. Al-Saffar, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files
by: Funda Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci
Published: (2023-09-01)

Assessment of the amount of apically extruded debris using three different reciprocating single endodontic file systems: An ex vivo study
by: Hasanain M Alnajm, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Do Continuous Rotating Endodontic Instruments Extrude Fewer Apical Debris Than Reciprocating Instruments in Non-Surgical Endodontic Retreatments? A Systematic Review
by: Francesco Puleio, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
by: Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ROTARY INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS ON THE AMOUNT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS
by: Bilge Lenger, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TORQUE SETTINGS ON THE AMOUNT OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS DURING ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION
by: Demet Altunbaş, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation with reciprocating single file system, continuous rotary multiple file system and manual technique: An in vitro study
by: Pratima Mohana, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

A systematic review of the impact of apical patency on postoperative pain
by: Samira Rezvani, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)

Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal filling material removal in teeth with external apical root resorption: a comparison of different obturation techniques
by: Büşra Melike Çağlar, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)

Influence of establishing a glide path on the amount of apically extruded debris and the preservation of root canal anatomy
by: Sehnaz Yilmaz, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Endodontic retreatment of apical periodontitis complicated with tooth perforation
Published: (2020-04-01)

Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
by: Komal Nanavati, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Erratum to “Comparative study of apically extruded debris using one manual and two rotary instrumentation techniques for endodontic retreatment” Journal of Dental Sciences (2012) 7, 1–6
by: Alper Kustarci, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)

A quantitative comparison of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using NiTi full-sequence rotary and single-file rotary systems: An in vitro study
by: Pallavi Goel, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)

Shaping ability and buckling resistance of TruNatomy, WaveOne gold, and XP-Endo shaper single-file systems
by: Neveen Ali Shaheen, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Effect of Different Glide Path Establishing Systems on Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals: An In Vitro Study
by: Krutika Shekhawat, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Comparative Evaluation of Debris and Irrigation Extruded Apically Using Different Design of Needles and Penetration Depth - An In Vitro Study
by: Maha A. Habeeb
Published: (2023-07-01)

In vitro assessment of the roles of initial preparation size and solvent application on apically extruded debris in endodontically treated teeth
by: Esra Yavaş, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Effect of different glide path establishing systems on apically extruded debris in curved root canals – An in vitro study
by: Prithwika Swarnakar, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Evaluation of apically extruded debris during removal of gutta-percha and ResilonTM using different instrumentation techniques
by: Pešić Dragana, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments
by: Sonal Soi, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)

Comparative Evaluation of Apical Debris Extrusion from the Root Canal using Hand Files, Continuous Rotary Files and Reciprocating File System: An In-vitro Study
by: Gagandeep Singh, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

The Effect of Cross-Section of Three Different Files on Apical Debris and Irrigant Solution Extrusion Using Full File Sequences: An In Vitro Study
by: Sohaib Fadhil Mohammed, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS AND IRRIGANT AFTER USING TWO ROTARY SYSTEMS (K3, RaCe)
by: Elka N. Radeva, et al.
Published: (2014-03-01)

The effect of access cavity design on apical debris extrusion
by: Ezgi Doğanay Yıldız
Published: (2023-09-01)