Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials

Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials

Background Despite the initial evidence supporting the utility of intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), adoption remains low. Recent new trial data have become available. An updated study‐level meta‐analysis comparing intravascular imaging to angiography to guide P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jayakumar Sreenivasan, Rohin K. Reddy, Yasser Jamil, Aaqib Malik, Daniel Chamie, James P. Howard, Michael G. Nanna, Gary S. Mintz, Akiko Maehara, Ziad A. Ali, Jeffrey W. Moses, Shao‐Liang Chen, Alaide Chieffo, Antonio Colombo, Martin B. Leon, Alexandra J. Lansky, Yousif Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
intravascular ultrasound
meta‐analysis
optical coherence tomography
percutaneous coronary intervention
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.031111

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.031111

Similar Items