Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?

Abstract EPA + DHA intake in land-locked central Europe (CE) is barely fulfilled. Imported marine fish/farmed salmonids are likely the backbone of an ailing EPA + DHA security. Supplementing with captured marine fish oil capsules (~0.5 g up to 1.6 g CO2-eq. mg EPA + DHA−1) could be comparable in GHG...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koushik Roy, Petr Dvorak, Zdenka Machova, Jan Mraz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-09-01
Series:npj Science of Food
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-023-00224-z
_version_ 1797556180801814528
author Koushik Roy
Petr Dvorak
Zdenka Machova
Jan Mraz
author_facet Koushik Roy
Petr Dvorak
Zdenka Machova
Jan Mraz
author_sort Koushik Roy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract EPA + DHA intake in land-locked central Europe (CE) is barely fulfilled. Imported marine fish/farmed salmonids are likely the backbone of an ailing EPA + DHA security. Supplementing with captured marine fish oil capsules (~0.5 g up to 1.6 g CO2-eq. mg EPA + DHA−1) could be comparable in GHG emissions with fish consumption itself (~1 g to as low as 0.6 g CO2-eq. mg EPA + DHA−1). But synergistic benefits of EPA + DHA intake by consuming fish protein need consideration too. Taking semi-intensive pond carp and intensively farmed salmon as models, we analyzed footprint, eco-services, and resource use efficiency perspectives of achieving EPA + DHA security in a CE region. Despite a lower production footprint, pond-farmed fish greatly lag in EPA + DHA supply (carp 101–181 mg 100 g−1 < salmon 750–1300 mg 100 g−1). It doubles-to-quadruples footprint ‘per mg’ of EPA + DHA: nitrogen (carp 18.3 > salmon 8.7 mg N), phosphorus (carp 6.8 > salmon 1.6 mg P), and climate change (carp 1.84 > salmon 0.8 g CO2-eq.). With enhancements in pond carp (>300 mg EPA + DHA 100 g−1), these differences may cease to exist. Harnessing EPA + DHA bioaccumulation pathways active in ponds, finishing feeding strategies, and polyculture, the EPA + DHA content in pond fish may be increased. Ecosystem services with EPA + DHA mining from pond food web or high EPA + DHA output-to-input ratio (pond carp 1–200 > RAS salmon 0.75) make ponds an eco-efficient system. As fish consumption in CE must improve, pond-farmed fish would be needed to complement (but not substitute) salmonid/marine fish/oil capsules consumption. Achieving EPA + DHA security with minimum pressure on the environment or global resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:59:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-afac5c96a00444e5b3d86fc0a109181b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2396-8370
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:59:14Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Science of Food
spelling doaj.art-afac5c96a00444e5b3d86fc0a109181b2023-11-20T11:02:56ZengNature Portfolionpj Science of Food2396-83702023-09-017111110.1038/s41538-023-00224-zNutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?Koushik Roy0Petr Dvorak1Zdenka Machova2Jan Mraz3Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceAbstract EPA + DHA intake in land-locked central Europe (CE) is barely fulfilled. Imported marine fish/farmed salmonids are likely the backbone of an ailing EPA + DHA security. Supplementing with captured marine fish oil capsules (~0.5 g up to 1.6 g CO2-eq. mg EPA + DHA−1) could be comparable in GHG emissions with fish consumption itself (~1 g to as low as 0.6 g CO2-eq. mg EPA + DHA−1). But synergistic benefits of EPA + DHA intake by consuming fish protein need consideration too. Taking semi-intensive pond carp and intensively farmed salmon as models, we analyzed footprint, eco-services, and resource use efficiency perspectives of achieving EPA + DHA security in a CE region. Despite a lower production footprint, pond-farmed fish greatly lag in EPA + DHA supply (carp 101–181 mg 100 g−1 < salmon 750–1300 mg 100 g−1). It doubles-to-quadruples footprint ‘per mg’ of EPA + DHA: nitrogen (carp 18.3 > salmon 8.7 mg N), phosphorus (carp 6.8 > salmon 1.6 mg P), and climate change (carp 1.84 > salmon 0.8 g CO2-eq.). With enhancements in pond carp (>300 mg EPA + DHA 100 g−1), these differences may cease to exist. Harnessing EPA + DHA bioaccumulation pathways active in ponds, finishing feeding strategies, and polyculture, the EPA + DHA content in pond fish may be increased. Ecosystem services with EPA + DHA mining from pond food web or high EPA + DHA output-to-input ratio (pond carp 1–200 > RAS salmon 0.75) make ponds an eco-efficient system. As fish consumption in CE must improve, pond-farmed fish would be needed to complement (but not substitute) salmonid/marine fish/oil capsules consumption. Achieving EPA + DHA security with minimum pressure on the environment or global resources.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-023-00224-z
spellingShingle Koushik Roy
Petr Dvorak
Zdenka Machova
Jan Mraz
Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
npj Science of Food
title Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
title_full Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
title_fullStr Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
title_full_unstemmed Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
title_short Nutrient footprint versus EPA + DHA security in land-locked regions—more of local pond farmed, imported marine fish or fish oil capsules?
title_sort nutrient footprint versus epa dha security in land locked regions more of local pond farmed imported marine fish or fish oil capsules
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-023-00224-z
work_keys_str_mv AT koushikroy nutrientfootprintversusepadhasecurityinlandlockedregionsmoreoflocalpondfarmedimportedmarinefishorfishoilcapsules
AT petrdvorak nutrientfootprintversusepadhasecurityinlandlockedregionsmoreoflocalpondfarmedimportedmarinefishorfishoilcapsules
AT zdenkamachova nutrientfootprintversusepadhasecurityinlandlockedregionsmoreoflocalpondfarmedimportedmarinefishorfishoilcapsules
AT janmraz nutrientfootprintversusepadhasecurityinlandlockedregionsmoreoflocalpondfarmedimportedmarinefishorfishoilcapsules