Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models

The history and philosophy of music education are traced with varied efforts to hone, enhance, and shift a strong tradition of performance-based instruction. The purpose of this study is to summarize the research of Gumm’s empirical models of eight music teaching and six conducting approaches and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alan J. Gumm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293872/full
_version_ 1797503202875146240
author Alan J. Gumm
author_facet Alan J. Gumm
author_sort Alan J. Gumm
collection DOAJ
description The history and philosophy of music education are traced with varied efforts to hone, enhance, and shift a strong tradition of performance-based instruction. The purpose of this study is to summarize the research of Gumm’s empirical models of eight music teaching and six conducting approaches and their application in the profession across three decades toward varied philosophical aims. Each approach coordinates a distinct set of instructional and motivational behaviors toward a particular learning effect or outcome. Different balances of approaches reveal broader aims, such as performance, comprehensive musicianship, cooperative, discovery, and affective learning, or even basic on-task behavior. Broader yet are two overarching aims found in common to both music teaching and conducting—to control or release. Controlling music teaching asserts correct on-task behavior through clear task directions and corrective feedback, motivates attention to task nonverbally, efficiently fills time with active tasks, and clarifies and affirms positive learning. In contrast, cooperative group leadership releases interdependent learning, questioning fosters music concept learning, imagery and movement release artistry, and discussing unique perspectives releases independent ideas and feelings. In conducting, precise gestures control accurate timing, signals and alerts motivate attention, and mimicry of musician exertions controls physical tone production; whereas shaping of phrases and score markings release musical expression, psychosocially familiarized gestures foster interdependence, and tension-easing gestures release freer independent tone production. Control-oriented teaching is most prevalent across the field, yet links to greater burnout and appeals to accommodating students motivated by effort and ability more than students motivated by social and affective enjoyment of music. In conducting, music-oriented precision and expression are more prevalent than musician-oriented approaches. Releasing approaches are more prevalent in Western than Eastern culture, upper levels, early rehearsals well before concerts, smaller ensembles, competitive ensembles, and teachers and conductors with greater experience or varied movement training. Conclusive implications are that the key to motivation is to draw attention to specific and intentional forms of learning, and that whatever is motivated to attention also motivates a particular philosophy of music education. Future research is suggested in general music and ethnic, folk, popular, community, and professional music ensembles.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:47:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b0cb4d1592bf4550ae30027bc7bebf4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:47:11Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-b0cb4d1592bf4550ae30027bc7bebf4f2023-11-23T09:06:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-11-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.12938721293872Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting modelsAlan J. GummThe history and philosophy of music education are traced with varied efforts to hone, enhance, and shift a strong tradition of performance-based instruction. The purpose of this study is to summarize the research of Gumm’s empirical models of eight music teaching and six conducting approaches and their application in the profession across three decades toward varied philosophical aims. Each approach coordinates a distinct set of instructional and motivational behaviors toward a particular learning effect or outcome. Different balances of approaches reveal broader aims, such as performance, comprehensive musicianship, cooperative, discovery, and affective learning, or even basic on-task behavior. Broader yet are two overarching aims found in common to both music teaching and conducting—to control or release. Controlling music teaching asserts correct on-task behavior through clear task directions and corrective feedback, motivates attention to task nonverbally, efficiently fills time with active tasks, and clarifies and affirms positive learning. In contrast, cooperative group leadership releases interdependent learning, questioning fosters music concept learning, imagery and movement release artistry, and discussing unique perspectives releases independent ideas and feelings. In conducting, precise gestures control accurate timing, signals and alerts motivate attention, and mimicry of musician exertions controls physical tone production; whereas shaping of phrases and score markings release musical expression, psychosocially familiarized gestures foster interdependence, and tension-easing gestures release freer independent tone production. Control-oriented teaching is most prevalent across the field, yet links to greater burnout and appeals to accommodating students motivated by effort and ability more than students motivated by social and affective enjoyment of music. In conducting, music-oriented precision and expression are more prevalent than musician-oriented approaches. Releasing approaches are more prevalent in Western than Eastern culture, upper levels, early rehearsals well before concerts, smaller ensembles, competitive ensembles, and teachers and conductors with greater experience or varied movement training. Conclusive implications are that the key to motivation is to draw attention to specific and intentional forms of learning, and that whatever is motivated to attention also motivates a particular philosophy of music education. Future research is suggested in general music and ethnic, folk, popular, community, and professional music ensembles.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293872/fullmusic teachingmusic conductingmusic motivationmusic performancecomprehensive musicianshipmusic education philosophy
spellingShingle Alan J. Gumm
Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
Frontiers in Psychology
music teaching
music conducting
music motivation
music performance
comprehensive musicianship
music education philosophy
title Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
title_full Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
title_fullStr Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
title_full_unstemmed Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
title_short Music motivation depends on what to motivate: research review of Gumm’s music teaching and conducting models
title_sort music motivation depends on what to motivate research review of gumm s music teaching and conducting models
topic music teaching
music conducting
music motivation
music performance
comprehensive musicianship
music education philosophy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293872/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alanjgumm musicmotivationdependsonwhattomotivateresearchreviewofgummsmusicteachingandconductingmodels