In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies

In southeastern USA, the use of baleage has increased as an alternative technology to hay production, thereby allowing for a timelier harvest of the conserved forage. A series of studies were conducted to determine the nutritive value, fermentation parameters, and in situ disappearance of the cool-s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Lynn Shoup, Russell Brian Muntifering, Mary Kimberly Mullenix, Liliane Severino Silva, Sandra Leanne Dillard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/21/2929
_version_ 1827647531352326144
author Sarah Lynn Shoup
Russell Brian Muntifering
Mary Kimberly Mullenix
Liliane Severino Silva
Sandra Leanne Dillard
author_facet Sarah Lynn Shoup
Russell Brian Muntifering
Mary Kimberly Mullenix
Liliane Severino Silva
Sandra Leanne Dillard
author_sort Sarah Lynn Shoup
collection DOAJ
description In southeastern USA, the use of baleage has increased as an alternative technology to hay production, thereby allowing for a timelier harvest of the conserved forage. A series of studies were conducted to determine the nutritive value, fermentation parameters, and in situ disappearance of the cool-season annual forage mixtures that were ensiled with or without silage inoculant for up to 120 d. The forage mixtures were wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) + brassica hybrid (<i>Brassica rapa</i> L. × <i>napus</i> L.) (WB), wheat + crimson clover (<i>Trifolium incarnatum</i> L.) (WC), and annual ryegrass (<i>Lolium multiflorum</i> Lam.) + oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) + crimson clover (ROC). The inoculant strategy affected the CP concentration (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with it increasing in WB and decreasing in ROC. Among the mixtures, the DM concentration decreased by up to 5%, and the NDF and ADF concentrations decreased by up to 10% during the ensiling period. The pH averaged 5.0, 5.0, and 5.5 for the WC, WB, and ROC mixtures, respectively. Based on our results, the baleage of the cool-season annual forage mixtures may provide a viable high-quality option to sustain animal growth and performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:21:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b1ba422ed3a2409da4503ffac954ee6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:21:19Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-b1ba422ed3a2409da4503ffac954ee6c2023-11-24T03:24:01ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-10-011221292910.3390/ani12212929In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant StrategiesSarah Lynn Shoup0Russell Brian Muntifering1Mary Kimberly Mullenix2Liliane Severino Silva3Sandra Leanne Dillard4Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USADepartment of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USADepartment of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USADepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Blackville, SC 29817, USADepartment of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USAIn southeastern USA, the use of baleage has increased as an alternative technology to hay production, thereby allowing for a timelier harvest of the conserved forage. A series of studies were conducted to determine the nutritive value, fermentation parameters, and in situ disappearance of the cool-season annual forage mixtures that were ensiled with or without silage inoculant for up to 120 d. The forage mixtures were wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) + brassica hybrid (<i>Brassica rapa</i> L. × <i>napus</i> L.) (WB), wheat + crimson clover (<i>Trifolium incarnatum</i> L.) (WC), and annual ryegrass (<i>Lolium multiflorum</i> Lam.) + oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) + crimson clover (ROC). The inoculant strategy affected the CP concentration (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with it increasing in WB and decreasing in ROC. Among the mixtures, the DM concentration decreased by up to 5%, and the NDF and ADF concentrations decreased by up to 10% during the ensiling period. The pH averaged 5.0, 5.0, and 5.5 for the WC, WB, and ROC mixtures, respectively. Based on our results, the baleage of the cool-season annual forage mixtures may provide a viable high-quality option to sustain animal growth and performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/21/2929cool-season foragesfermentation parametersin situ dry mattermicrobial inoculationbaleage
spellingShingle Sarah Lynn Shoup
Russell Brian Muntifering
Mary Kimberly Mullenix
Liliane Severino Silva
Sandra Leanne Dillard
In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
Animals
cool-season forages
fermentation parameters
in situ dry matter
microbial inoculation
baleage
title In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
title_full In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
title_fullStr In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
title_full_unstemmed In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
title_short In Situ Ruminal Digestion, Fermentation Parameters, and Forage Nutritive Value of Cool-Season Baleage Ensiled under Contrasting Inoculant Strategies
title_sort in situ ruminal digestion fermentation parameters and forage nutritive value of cool season baleage ensiled under contrasting inoculant strategies
topic cool-season forages
fermentation parameters
in situ dry matter
microbial inoculation
baleage
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/21/2929
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahlynnshoup insituruminaldigestionfermentationparametersandforagenutritivevalueofcoolseasonbaleageensiledundercontrastinginoculantstrategies
AT russellbrianmuntifering insituruminaldigestionfermentationparametersandforagenutritivevalueofcoolseasonbaleageensiledundercontrastinginoculantstrategies
AT marykimberlymullenix insituruminaldigestionfermentationparametersandforagenutritivevalueofcoolseasonbaleageensiledundercontrastinginoculantstrategies
AT lilianeseverinosilva insituruminaldigestionfermentationparametersandforagenutritivevalueofcoolseasonbaleageensiledundercontrastinginoculantstrategies
AT sandraleannedillard insituruminaldigestionfermentationparametersandforagenutritivevalueofcoolseasonbaleageensiledundercontrastinginoculantstrategies