Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
Abstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the q...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Molecular Systems Biology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560 |
_version_ | 1797285488704356352 |
---|---|
author | John Nguyen Johannes Pettmann Philipp Kruger Omer Dushek |
author_facet | John Nguyen Johannes Pettmann Philipp Kruger Omer Dushek |
author_sort | John Nguyen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the question of whether they have similar impacts on T‐cell responses. Here, we screened for the quantitative impact of these TNFRSFs on primary human CD8+ T‐cell cytokine production. Although both 4‐1BB and CD27 increased production, only 4‐1BB was able to prolong the duration over which cytokine was produced, and both had only modest effects on antigen sensitivity. An operational model explained these different phenotypes using shared signalling based on the surface expression of 4‐1BB being regulated through signalling feedback. The model predicted and experiments confirmed that CD27 co‐stimulation increases 4‐1BB expression and subsequent 4‐1BB co‐stimulation. GITR and OX40 displayed only minor effects on their own but, like 4‐1BB, CD27 could enhance GITR expression and subsequent GITR co‐stimulation. Thus, different co‐stimulation receptors can have different quantitative effects allowing for synergy and fine‐tuning of T‐cell responses. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:02:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b3e52d9a0e4f482f91381dbc37aef416 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1744-4292 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:02:53Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Springer Nature |
record_format | Article |
series | Molecular Systems Biology |
spelling | doaj.art-b3e52d9a0e4f482f91381dbc37aef4162024-03-02T10:22:15ZengSpringer NatureMolecular Systems Biology1744-42922021-11-011711n/an/a10.15252/msb.202110560Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responsesJohn Nguyen0Johannes Pettmann1Philipp Kruger2Omer Dushek3SirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKAbstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the question of whether they have similar impacts on T‐cell responses. Here, we screened for the quantitative impact of these TNFRSFs on primary human CD8+ T‐cell cytokine production. Although both 4‐1BB and CD27 increased production, only 4‐1BB was able to prolong the duration over which cytokine was produced, and both had only modest effects on antigen sensitivity. An operational model explained these different phenotypes using shared signalling based on the surface expression of 4‐1BB being regulated through signalling feedback. The model predicted and experiments confirmed that CD27 co‐stimulation increases 4‐1BB expression and subsequent 4‐1BB co‐stimulation. GITR and OX40 displayed only minor effects on their own but, like 4‐1BB, CD27 could enhance GITR expression and subsequent GITR co‐stimulation. Thus, different co‐stimulation receptors can have different quantitative effects allowing for synergy and fine‐tuning of T‐cell responses.https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560co‐stimulationmodellingquantitative phenotypesT cellstumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily |
spellingShingle | John Nguyen Johannes Pettmann Philipp Kruger Omer Dushek Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses Molecular Systems Biology co‐stimulation modelling quantitative phenotypes T cells tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily |
title | Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses |
title_full | Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses |
title_fullStr | Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses |
title_short | Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses |
title_sort | quantitative contributions of tnf receptor superfamily members to cd8 t cell responses |
topic | co‐stimulation modelling quantitative phenotypes T cells tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily |
url | https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnnguyen quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses AT johannespettmann quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses AT philippkruger quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses AT omerdushek quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses |