Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses

Abstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Nguyen, Johannes Pettmann, Philipp Kruger, Omer Dushek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2021-11-01
Series:Molecular Systems Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560
_version_ 1797285488704356352
author John Nguyen
Johannes Pettmann
Philipp Kruger
Omer Dushek
author_facet John Nguyen
Johannes Pettmann
Philipp Kruger
Omer Dushek
author_sort John Nguyen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the question of whether they have similar impacts on T‐cell responses. Here, we screened for the quantitative impact of these TNFRSFs on primary human CD8+ T‐cell cytokine production. Although both 4‐1BB and CD27 increased production, only 4‐1BB was able to prolong the duration over which cytokine was produced, and both had only modest effects on antigen sensitivity. An operational model explained these different phenotypes using shared signalling based on the surface expression of 4‐1BB being regulated through signalling feedback. The model predicted and experiments confirmed that CD27 co‐stimulation increases 4‐1BB expression and subsequent 4‐1BB co‐stimulation. GITR and OX40 displayed only minor effects on their own but, like 4‐1BB, CD27 could enhance GITR expression and subsequent GITR co‐stimulation. Thus, different co‐stimulation receptors can have different quantitative effects allowing for synergy and fine‐tuning of T‐cell responses.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T18:02:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b3e52d9a0e4f482f91381dbc37aef416
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T18:02:53Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Molecular Systems Biology
spelling doaj.art-b3e52d9a0e4f482f91381dbc37aef4162024-03-02T10:22:15ZengSpringer NatureMolecular Systems Biology1744-42922021-11-011711n/an/a10.15252/msb.202110560Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responsesJohn Nguyen0Johannes Pettmann1Philipp Kruger2Omer Dushek3SirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKSirWilliam Dunn School of Pathology University of Oxford Oxford UKAbstract T‐cell responses to infections and cancers are regulated by co‐signalling receptors grouped into the binary categories of co‐stimulation or co‐inhibition. The co‐stimulation TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members 4‐1BB, CD27, GITR and OX40 have similar signalling mechanisms raising the question of whether they have similar impacts on T‐cell responses. Here, we screened for the quantitative impact of these TNFRSFs on primary human CD8+ T‐cell cytokine production. Although both 4‐1BB and CD27 increased production, only 4‐1BB was able to prolong the duration over which cytokine was produced, and both had only modest effects on antigen sensitivity. An operational model explained these different phenotypes using shared signalling based on the surface expression of 4‐1BB being regulated through signalling feedback. The model predicted and experiments confirmed that CD27 co‐stimulation increases 4‐1BB expression and subsequent 4‐1BB co‐stimulation. GITR and OX40 displayed only minor effects on their own but, like 4‐1BB, CD27 could enhance GITR expression and subsequent GITR co‐stimulation. Thus, different co‐stimulation receptors can have different quantitative effects allowing for synergy and fine‐tuning of T‐cell responses.https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560co‐stimulationmodellingquantitative phenotypesT cellstumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily
spellingShingle John Nguyen
Johannes Pettmann
Philipp Kruger
Omer Dushek
Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
Molecular Systems Biology
co‐stimulation
modelling
quantitative phenotypes
T cells
tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily
title Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
title_full Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
title_fullStr Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
title_short Quantitative contributions of TNF receptor superfamily members to CD8+ T‐cell responses
title_sort quantitative contributions of tnf receptor superfamily members to cd8 t cell responses
topic co‐stimulation
modelling
quantitative phenotypes
T cells
tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily
url https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110560
work_keys_str_mv AT johnnguyen quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses
AT johannespettmann quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses
AT philippkruger quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses
AT omerdushek quantitativecontributionsoftnfreceptorsuperfamilymemberstocd8tcellresponses