Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?

Purpose – This paper analyzes the ethics of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly regarding AI-generated educational content in academia. It attempts to explore how AI customization mimics human interaction and behavior in education, investigate ethical concerns in educational AI ad...

Ful tanımlama

Detaylı Bibliyografya
Asıl Yazarlar: Anuj Kumar, Arya Kumar, Sanjay Bhoyar, Ashutosh Kumar Mishra
Materyal Türü: Makale
Dil:English
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: Emerald Publishing 2024-09-01
Seri Bilgileri:Public Administration and Policy
Konular:
Online Erişim:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-05-2023-0061/full/pdf
_version_ 1827121925459017728
author Anuj Kumar
Arya Kumar
Sanjay Bhoyar
Ashutosh Kumar Mishra
author_facet Anuj Kumar
Arya Kumar
Sanjay Bhoyar
Ashutosh Kumar Mishra
author_sort Anuj Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – This paper analyzes the ethics of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly regarding AI-generated educational content in academia. It attempts to explore how AI customization mimics human interaction and behavior in education, investigate ethical concerns in educational AI adoption, and assess ChatGPT’s ethical use for nurturing curiosity and maintaining academic integrity in education. Design/methodology/approach – Fictional tales may help us think critically and creatively to uncover hidden truths. The narratives are analyzed to determine the affordances and drawbacks of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd). Findings – The study highlights the imperative for innovative, ethically grounded strategies in harnessing AI/GPT technology for education. AI can enhance learning, and human educators’ irreplaceable role is even more prominent, emphasizing the need to harmonize technology with pedagogical principles. However, ensuring the ethical integration of AI/GPT technology demands a delicate balance where the potential benefits of technology should not eclipse the essential role of human educators in the learning process. Originality/value – This paper presents futuristic academic scenarios to explore critical dimensions and their impact on 21st century learning. As AI assumes tasks once exclusive to human educators, it is essential to redefine the roles of both technology and human teachers, focusing on the future.
first_indexed 2025-03-20T14:00:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b582af545c4d4969b51d48a7db3840a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1727-2645
2517-679X
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-20T14:00:53Z
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series Public Administration and Policy
spelling doaj.art-b582af545c4d4969b51d48a7db3840a52024-09-11T14:54:14ZengEmerald PublishingPublic Administration and Policy1727-26452517-679X2024-09-0127214015310.1108/PAP-05-2023-0061Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?Anuj Kumar0Arya Kumar1Sanjay Bhoyar2Ashutosh Kumar Mishra3Rushford Business School, Lucerne, SwitzerlandKalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Bhubaneswar, IndiaNational Institute of Construction Management and Research, Pune, IndiaSubedar Rajdevi Memorial Business School, Lucknow, IndiaPurpose – This paper analyzes the ethics of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly regarding AI-generated educational content in academia. It attempts to explore how AI customization mimics human interaction and behavior in education, investigate ethical concerns in educational AI adoption, and assess ChatGPT’s ethical use for nurturing curiosity and maintaining academic integrity in education. Design/methodology/approach – Fictional tales may help us think critically and creatively to uncover hidden truths. The narratives are analyzed to determine the affordances and drawbacks of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd). Findings – The study highlights the imperative for innovative, ethically grounded strategies in harnessing AI/GPT technology for education. AI can enhance learning, and human educators’ irreplaceable role is even more prominent, emphasizing the need to harmonize technology with pedagogical principles. However, ensuring the ethical integration of AI/GPT technology demands a delicate balance where the potential benefits of technology should not eclipse the essential role of human educators in the learning process. Originality/value – This paper presents futuristic academic scenarios to explore critical dimensions and their impact on 21st century learning. As AI assumes tasks once exclusive to human educators, it is essential to redefine the roles of both technology and human teachers, focusing on the future.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-05-2023-0061/full/pdfArtificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd)Academic innovationAcademic misconductGenerative pre-trained transformer (GPT)Ethical practice
spellingShingle Anuj Kumar
Arya Kumar
Sanjay Bhoyar
Ashutosh Kumar Mishra
Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
Public Administration and Policy
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd)
Academic innovation
Academic misconduct
Generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)
Ethical practice
title Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
title_full Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
title_fullStr Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
title_full_unstemmed Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
title_short Does ChatGPT foster academic misconduct in the future?
title_sort does chatgpt foster academic misconduct in the future
topic Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd)
Academic innovation
Academic misconduct
Generative pre-trained transformer (GPT)
Ethical practice
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PAP-05-2023-0061/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anujkumar doeschatgptfosteracademicmisconductinthefuture
AT aryakumar doeschatgptfosteracademicmisconductinthefuture
AT sanjaybhoyar doeschatgptfosteracademicmisconductinthefuture
AT ashutoshkumarmishra doeschatgptfosteracademicmisconductinthefuture