Cross-validation of bias-corrected climate simulations is misleading
<p>We demonstrate both analytically and with a modelling example that cross-validation of free-running bias-corrected climate change simulations against observations is misleading. The underlying reasoning is as follows: a cross-validation can have in principle two outcomes. A negative (in...
Main Authors: | D. Maraun, M. Widmann |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/4867/2018/hess-22-4867-2018.pdf |
Similar Items
-
A combined statistical bias correction and stochastic downscaling method for precipitation
by: C. Volosciuk, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
The representation of location by a regional climate model in complex terrain
by: D. Maraun, et al.
Published: (2015-08-01) -
Climate-washing litigation: legal liability for misleading climate communications
by: Benjamin, L, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A novel bias correction methodology for climate impact simulations
by: S. Sippel, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Are HoLEP Surgical Videos on YouTube Biased and Misleading or Are They Leading the Industry?
by: Ömer Koraş, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)