Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing

[English]: This qualitative study with phenomenology design aims to investigate the use of backing and its relation to rebuttal and qualifier in prospective mathematics teachers’ (PMTs) argumentation when constructing a mathematical proof about algebraic function. The data were collected through sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Martha Laamena, Toto Nusantara
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram 2019-05-01
Series:Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/view/272
_version_ 1818933245646995456
author Christina Martha Laamena
Toto Nusantara
author_facet Christina Martha Laamena
Toto Nusantara
author_sort Christina Martha Laamena
collection DOAJ
description [English]: This qualitative study with phenomenology design aims to investigate the use of backing and its relation to rebuttal and qualifier in prospective mathematics teachers’ (PMTs) argumentation when constructing a mathematical proof about algebraic function. The data were collected through subjects' works on the proof, recorded think-aloud data, and in-depth interviews. Data analysis was guided by Toulmin’s argumentation scheme. The results show that the PMTs used three types of backing, i.e., backing in the form of definitions or theorems (reference backing), examples of numbers (numerical backing) and graphs of functions (graphical backing). The PMTs utilized the backings to strengthen deductive and inductive warrant. A numerical backing is used when a warrant cannot justify the truth of a claim. Graphical backing is used to convince oneself about the truth of the data that has been made while the reference backing is only clarification when students have understood or have knowledge of the statement given. Numerical and graphical backing relate directly to rebuttal and provide counter-examples and qualifier of the claim. A numerical backing makes students more confident about claims that are generated compared to reference backing. Keywords: Argumentation, Mathematical proof, Backing [Bahasa]: Penelitian kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologi ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki penggunaan backing dan hubungannya dengan rebuttal dan qualifier dalam membangun bukti matematika terkait fungsi aljabar oleh calon guru matematika. Data dikumpulkan melalui hasil kerja siswa, rekaman think aloud, dan wawancara mendalam. Analisis data merujuk pada skema argumentasi Toulmin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa backing yang digunakan siswa tidak hanya berbentuk teorema atau definisis (reference backing) tetapi juga contoh-contoh bilangan (numerical backing) dan grafik fungsi (graphical backing). Ketiga jenis backing tersebut untuk memperkuat warrant induktif maupun deduktif. Numerical backing digunakan ketika warrant tidak dapat menjustifikasi kebenaran klaim. Graphical backing digunakan untuk meyakinkan diri sendiri tentang kebenaran klaim yang telah dibuat sedangkan reference backing hanya bersifat klarifikasi karena siswa telah memahami pernyataan yang diberikan. Numerical backing dan graphical backing berhubungan langsung dengan rebuttal untuk memberikan contoh penyangkal dan jaminan kebenaran (qualifier) klaim. Numerical backing membuat siswa lebih percaya diri tentang klaim yang dihasilkan dibandingkan dengan reference backing. Kata kunci: Argumentasi, Bukti matematis, Backing
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:45:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b93ad046f8e243e9a4c713937fcf5cd4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2085-5893
2541-0458
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:45:19Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
record_format Article
series Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
spelling doaj.art-b93ad046f8e243e9a4c713937fcf5cd42022-12-21T19:53:01ZindUniversitas Islam Negeri MataramBeta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika2085-58932541-04582019-05-01121435910.20414/betajtm.v12i1.272272Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backingChristina Martha Laamena0Toto Nusantara1Universitas PattimuraUniversitas Negeri Malang[English]: This qualitative study with phenomenology design aims to investigate the use of backing and its relation to rebuttal and qualifier in prospective mathematics teachers’ (PMTs) argumentation when constructing a mathematical proof about algebraic function. The data were collected through subjects' works on the proof, recorded think-aloud data, and in-depth interviews. Data analysis was guided by Toulmin’s argumentation scheme. The results show that the PMTs used three types of backing, i.e., backing in the form of definitions or theorems (reference backing), examples of numbers (numerical backing) and graphs of functions (graphical backing). The PMTs utilized the backings to strengthen deductive and inductive warrant. A numerical backing is used when a warrant cannot justify the truth of a claim. Graphical backing is used to convince oneself about the truth of the data that has been made while the reference backing is only clarification when students have understood or have knowledge of the statement given. Numerical and graphical backing relate directly to rebuttal and provide counter-examples and qualifier of the claim. A numerical backing makes students more confident about claims that are generated compared to reference backing. Keywords: Argumentation, Mathematical proof, Backing [Bahasa]: Penelitian kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologi ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki penggunaan backing dan hubungannya dengan rebuttal dan qualifier dalam membangun bukti matematika terkait fungsi aljabar oleh calon guru matematika. Data dikumpulkan melalui hasil kerja siswa, rekaman think aloud, dan wawancara mendalam. Analisis data merujuk pada skema argumentasi Toulmin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa backing yang digunakan siswa tidak hanya berbentuk teorema atau definisis (reference backing) tetapi juga contoh-contoh bilangan (numerical backing) dan grafik fungsi (graphical backing). Ketiga jenis backing tersebut untuk memperkuat warrant induktif maupun deduktif. Numerical backing digunakan ketika warrant tidak dapat menjustifikasi kebenaran klaim. Graphical backing digunakan untuk meyakinkan diri sendiri tentang kebenaran klaim yang telah dibuat sedangkan reference backing hanya bersifat klarifikasi karena siswa telah memahami pernyataan yang diberikan. Numerical backing dan graphical backing berhubungan langsung dengan rebuttal untuk memberikan contoh penyangkal dan jaminan kebenaran (qualifier) klaim. Numerical backing membuat siswa lebih percaya diri tentang klaim yang dihasilkan dibandingkan dengan reference backing. Kata kunci: Argumentasi, Bukti matematis, Backinghttps://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/view/272ArgumentationBackingMathematics proof
spellingShingle Christina Martha Laamena
Toto Nusantara
Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
Argumentation
Backing
Mathematics proof
title Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
title_full Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
title_fullStr Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
title_full_unstemmed Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
title_short Prospective mathematics teachers’ argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof: The importance of backing
title_sort prospective mathematics teachers argumentation structure when constructing a mathematical proof the importance of backing
topic Argumentation
Backing
Mathematics proof
url https://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/view/272
work_keys_str_mv AT christinamarthalaamena prospectivemathematicsteachersargumentationstructurewhenconstructingamathematicalprooftheimportanceofbacking
AT totonusantara prospectivemathematicsteachersargumentationstructurewhenconstructingamathematicalprooftheimportanceofbacking