Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis

This paper shows the results of a quantitative study which tests the correlation between levels of educational attainment and the resistance to cognitive errors. Do diplomas protect us against inferential mistakes? Do they increase our consciousness of the type of reasoning we use implicitly? Does t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gérald Bronner
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Éditions Kimé 2008-10-01
Series:Philosophia Scientiæ
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/125
_version_ 1797402557698539520
author Gérald Bronner
author_facet Gérald Bronner
author_sort Gérald Bronner
collection DOAJ
description This paper shows the results of a quantitative study which tests the correlation between levels of educational attainment and the resistance to cognitive errors. Do diplomas protect us against inferential mistakes? Do they increase our consciousness of the type of reasoning we use implicitly? Does the type of diploma we have affect these factors? The questions are important as they allow us to challenge the naturalist understanding of cognitive bias generally accepted by orthodox theories of the psychology of error. The results obtained by this study of 1559 people are not conclusive and their interpretations should be subject to caution, but they throw doubt on explanations with a strong naturalist or culturalist bias.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ba29692c1cf048c982decd6650a2fa76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1281-2463
1775-4283
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:03Z
publishDate 2008-10-01
publisher Éditions Kimé
record_format Article
series Philosophia Scientiæ
spelling doaj.art-ba29692c1cf048c982decd6650a2fa762023-12-06T15:54:38ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832008-10-0112219321110.4000/philosophiascientiae.125Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquisGérald BronnerThis paper shows the results of a quantitative study which tests the correlation between levels of educational attainment and the resistance to cognitive errors. Do diplomas protect us against inferential mistakes? Do they increase our consciousness of the type of reasoning we use implicitly? Does the type of diploma we have affect these factors? The questions are important as they allow us to challenge the naturalist understanding of cognitive bias generally accepted by orthodox theories of the psychology of error. The results obtained by this study of 1559 people are not conclusive and their interpretations should be subject to caution, but they throw doubt on explanations with a strong naturalist or culturalist bias.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/125
spellingShingle Gérald Bronner
Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
Philosophia Scientiæ
title Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
title_full Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
title_fullStr Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
title_full_unstemmed Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
title_short Les normes du raisonnement : entre inné et acquis
title_sort les normes du raisonnement entre inne et acquis
url http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/125
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldbronner lesnormesduraisonnemententreinneetacquis