Equimodalidade e Hôs Epi To Poly no De Interpretatione 9
In the first part of De Interpretatione 9, Aristotle introduces an argument for fatalism that he obviously does not subscribe to. Readers of the chapter wonder how Aristotle replies to that argument. In this paper I claim that the main basis of his reply is the principle of equimodality stated in 19...
מחבר ראשי: | Ricardo Santos |
---|---|
פורמט: | Article |
שפה: | deu |
יצא לאור: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2021-05-01
|
סדרה: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
גישה מקוונת: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/185983 |
פריטים דומים
-
ARISTOTELIO KOMENTARAI: DE INTERPRETATIONE 9
מאת: Anicijus Manlijus Severinas Boecijus
יצא לאור: (2016-11-01) -
Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
מאת: M. A. Istvan Jr.
יצא לאור: (2014-01-01) -
Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
מאת: M. A. Istvan Jr.
יצא לאור: (2014-08-01) -
Temporal Truth and Bivalence: an Anachronistic Formal Approach to Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 9
מאת: Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos
יצא לאור: (2023-05-01) -
De interpretatione christiana verbi „metanoia”
מאת: Jurand Maria Bakalarczy
יצא לאור: (2001-03-01)