Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It can be challenging for patients and clinicians to properly interpret a change in the clinical condition after a treatment has been given. It is not known to which extent spontaneous improvement, effect of placebo and effect of act...
Main Authors: | Gøtzsche Peter C, Hróbjartsson Asbjørn, Krogsbøll Lasse |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/9/1 |
Similar Items
-
Sponsors’ participation in conduct and reporting of industry trials: a descriptive study
by: Lundh Andreas, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
by: Andreas Lundh, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
by: Peter C Gøtzsche, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01) -
Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials.
by: Gøtzsche, P, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
by: Chan, A, et al.
Published: (2008)