Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity

In this paper the effects of rollers-billet friction coefficient (RFC) and plug-billet friction coefficient (PFC) during the skew rolling piercing process are investigated. The piercing process has been simulated and the plastic deformation, temperature evolution, and surface twisting of pierced tub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamed Aghajani Derazkola, Eduardo Garcia, Alberto Murillo-Marrodán
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423016952
_version_ 1797745142764929024
author Hamed Aghajani Derazkola
Eduardo Garcia
Alberto Murillo-Marrodán
author_facet Hamed Aghajani Derazkola
Eduardo Garcia
Alberto Murillo-Marrodán
author_sort Hamed Aghajani Derazkola
collection DOAJ
description In this paper the effects of rollers-billet friction coefficient (RFC) and plug-billet friction coefficient (PFC) during the skew rolling piercing process are investigated. The piercing process has been simulated and the plastic deformation, temperature evolution, and surface twisting of pierced tube analysed. Results show that the plastic deformation of super-martensitic Cr13 stainless steel increases at higher RFC and decreases at higher PFC. The same trend has been observed for material strain rate, which increases with higher RFC but decreases with increasing PFC. In addition, it has been found that friction coefficient does not affect the temperature evolution of the billet. In fact, the material heating during piercing is related to plastic deformation. Comparison of the fracture surfaces of the hot tension test samples at 0.01 s−1 and 10 s−1 confirm this point. The RFC increases the forward material velocity, and PFC decreases the forward material during the skew rolling piercing process. The PFC decreases the material velocity due to the ductile fracture growth obstacle inside the tube. More plastic deformation at higher PFC leads to higher surface twisting. The maximum surface twisting was 68° at RFC = 0.6 and PFC = 0.06, and the minimum surface twisting was 12° at RFC = 0.2 and PFC = 0.15.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:20:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c0257f9d2f9040d199fb6c41b95ef974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2238-7854
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:20:12Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Materials Research and Technology
spelling doaj.art-c0257f9d2f9040d199fb6c41b95ef9742023-08-11T05:34:43ZengElsevierJournal of Materials Research and Technology2238-78542023-07-012572547272Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocityHamed Aghajani Derazkola0Eduardo Garcia1Alberto Murillo-Marrodán2Corresponding author.; Department of Mechanics, Design and Industrial Management, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, SpainDepartment of Mechanics, Design and Industrial Management, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, SpainDepartment of Mechanics, Design and Industrial Management, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, SpainIn this paper the effects of rollers-billet friction coefficient (RFC) and plug-billet friction coefficient (PFC) during the skew rolling piercing process are investigated. The piercing process has been simulated and the plastic deformation, temperature evolution, and surface twisting of pierced tube analysed. Results show that the plastic deformation of super-martensitic Cr13 stainless steel increases at higher RFC and decreases at higher PFC. The same trend has been observed for material strain rate, which increases with higher RFC but decreases with increasing PFC. In addition, it has been found that friction coefficient does not affect the temperature evolution of the billet. In fact, the material heating during piercing is related to plastic deformation. Comparison of the fracture surfaces of the hot tension test samples at 0.01 s−1 and 10 s−1 confirm this point. The RFC increases the forward material velocity, and PFC decreases the forward material during the skew rolling piercing process. The PFC decreases the material velocity due to the ductile fracture growth obstacle inside the tube. More plastic deformation at higher PFC leads to higher surface twisting. The maximum surface twisting was 68° at RFC = 0.6 and PFC = 0.06, and the minimum surface twisting was 12° at RFC = 0.2 and PFC = 0.15.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423016952Skew rolling piercingFriction coefficientFinite element methodSuper-martensitic Cr13 stainless steelPlastic deformation
spellingShingle Hamed Aghajani Derazkola
Eduardo Garcia
Alberto Murillo-Marrodán
Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Skew rolling piercing
Friction coefficient
Finite element method
Super-martensitic Cr13 stainless steel
Plastic deformation
title Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
title_full Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
title_fullStr Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
title_full_unstemmed Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
title_short Effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting, strain rate and forming velocity
title_sort effects of skew rolling piercing process friction coefficient on tube twisting strain rate and forming velocity
topic Skew rolling piercing
Friction coefficient
Finite element method
Super-martensitic Cr13 stainless steel
Plastic deformation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785423016952
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedaghajaniderazkola effectsofskewrollingpiercingprocessfrictioncoefficientontubetwistingstrainrateandformingvelocity
AT eduardogarcia effectsofskewrollingpiercingprocessfrictioncoefficientontubetwistingstrainrateandformingvelocity
AT albertomurillomarrodan effectsofskewrollingpiercingprocessfrictioncoefficientontubetwistingstrainrateandformingvelocity