Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression

Abstract Decoding others’ facial expressions is critical for social functioning. To clarify the neural correlates of expression perception depending on where we look on the face, three combined gaze-contingent ERP experiments were analyzed using robust mass-univariate statistics. Regardless of task,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roxane J. Itier, Amie J. Durston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44355-5
_version_ 1797559930862960640
author Roxane J. Itier
Amie J. Durston
author_facet Roxane J. Itier
Amie J. Durston
author_sort Roxane J. Itier
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Decoding others’ facial expressions is critical for social functioning. To clarify the neural correlates of expression perception depending on where we look on the face, three combined gaze-contingent ERP experiments were analyzed using robust mass-univariate statistics. Regardless of task, fixation location impacted face processing from 50 to 350 ms, maximally around 120 ms, reflecting retinotopic mapping around C2 and P1 components. Fixation location also impacted majorly the N170-P2 interval while weak effects were seen at the face-sensitive N170 peak. Results question the widespread assumption that faces are processed holistically into an indecomposable perceptual whole around the N170. Rather, face processing is a complex and view-dependent process that continues well beyond the N170. Expression and fixation location interacted weakly during the P1-N170 interval, supporting a role for the mouth and left eye in fearful and happy expression decoding. Expression effects were weakest at the N170 peak but strongest around P2, especially for fear, reflecting task-independent affective processing. Results suggest N170 reflects a transition between processes rather than the maximum of a holistic face processing stage. Focus on this peak should be replaced by data-driven analyses of the epoch using robust statistics to fully unravel the early visual processing of faces and their affective content.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:52:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2406f19f8f24fb29189e7a0e78415be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:52:11Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-c2406f19f8f24fb29189e7a0e78415be2023-11-20T09:18:59ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111510.1038/s41598-023-44355-5Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expressionRoxane J. Itier0Amie J. Durston1Department of Psychology, University of WaterlooDepartment of Psychology, University of WaterlooAbstract Decoding others’ facial expressions is critical for social functioning. To clarify the neural correlates of expression perception depending on where we look on the face, three combined gaze-contingent ERP experiments were analyzed using robust mass-univariate statistics. Regardless of task, fixation location impacted face processing from 50 to 350 ms, maximally around 120 ms, reflecting retinotopic mapping around C2 and P1 components. Fixation location also impacted majorly the N170-P2 interval while weak effects were seen at the face-sensitive N170 peak. Results question the widespread assumption that faces are processed holistically into an indecomposable perceptual whole around the N170. Rather, face processing is a complex and view-dependent process that continues well beyond the N170. Expression and fixation location interacted weakly during the P1-N170 interval, supporting a role for the mouth and left eye in fearful and happy expression decoding. Expression effects were weakest at the N170 peak but strongest around P2, especially for fear, reflecting task-independent affective processing. Results suggest N170 reflects a transition between processes rather than the maximum of a holistic face processing stage. Focus on this peak should be replaced by data-driven analyses of the epoch using robust statistics to fully unravel the early visual processing of faces and their affective content.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44355-5
spellingShingle Roxane J. Itier
Amie J. Durston
Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
Scientific Reports
title Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
title_full Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
title_fullStr Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
title_full_unstemmed Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
title_short Mass-univariate analysis of scalp ERPs reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
title_sort mass univariate analysis of scalp erps reveals large effects of gaze fixation location during face processing that only weakly interact with face emotional expression
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44355-5
work_keys_str_mv AT roxanejitier massunivariateanalysisofscalperpsrevealslargeeffectsofgazefixationlocationduringfaceprocessingthatonlyweaklyinteractwithfaceemotionalexpression
AT amiejdurston massunivariateanalysisofscalperpsrevealslargeeffectsofgazefixationlocationduringfaceprocessingthatonlyweaklyinteractwithfaceemotionalexpression