Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Summary: Background: An increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLA) has been suspected with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in the CANVAS programme with canagliflozin and in pharmacovigilance reports with all SGLT2is. Even if reassuring observations were repor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andre J. Scheen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-04-01
Series:Diabetes Epidemiology and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000051
_version_ 1818206533239963648
author Andre J. Scheen
author_facet Andre J. Scheen
author_sort Andre J. Scheen
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: An increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLA) has been suspected with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in the CANVAS programme with canagliflozin and in pharmacovigilance reports with all SGLT2is. Even if reassuring observations were reported in several large prospective placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials, real-life conditions in more frailty patients might be associated with a higher risk. Methods: This work analyses the incidence of LLA events in retrospective observational studies that compared SGLT2i users with patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), a pharmacological class with an excellent safety profile. A meta-analysis of 12 comparative cohort studies (9 of them using a propensity score matching) worldwide has been performed. Results: The relative risk of LLA tended to be slightly lower in SGLT2i users (1228 LLA events/711159 patients) versus DPP-4i users: 2167 LLA events/1121914 patients, with a hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, p=0.01). However, a high between-study heterogeneity was observed (I² = 79%, P<0.00001), which could not be explained by differences across countries, between studies with/without propensity score matching, between cohorts treated with/without canagliflozin or between patients with/without peripheral artery disease. The incidence rate expressed as a number of LLA events per 1000 patient.years was almost similar among SGLT2i users and DPP-4i users (2.48±1.45 versus 2.67±3.09, p=0.849). Conclusion: Physicians should not fear an increased risk of LLA with SGLT2is compared with DPP-4is in daily clinical practice, even if caution may be advised in some patients exposed to special conditions.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:14:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c24195b509a8441f8b1d5f210e9d9c13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-9706
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:14:32Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Diabetes Epidemiology and Management
spelling doaj.art-c24195b509a8441f8b1d5f210e9d9c132022-12-22T00:38:30ZengElsevierDiabetes Epidemiology and Management2666-97062022-04-016100054Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studiesAndre J. Scheen0Department of Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), Liège University, Liège, BelgiumSummary: Background: An increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLA) has been suspected with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in the CANVAS programme with canagliflozin and in pharmacovigilance reports with all SGLT2is. Even if reassuring observations were reported in several large prospective placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials, real-life conditions in more frailty patients might be associated with a higher risk. Methods: This work analyses the incidence of LLA events in retrospective observational studies that compared SGLT2i users with patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), a pharmacological class with an excellent safety profile. A meta-analysis of 12 comparative cohort studies (9 of them using a propensity score matching) worldwide has been performed. Results: The relative risk of LLA tended to be slightly lower in SGLT2i users (1228 LLA events/711159 patients) versus DPP-4i users: 2167 LLA events/1121914 patients, with a hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, p=0.01). However, a high between-study heterogeneity was observed (I² = 79%, P<0.00001), which could not be explained by differences across countries, between studies with/without propensity score matching, between cohorts treated with/without canagliflozin or between patients with/without peripheral artery disease. The incidence rate expressed as a number of LLA events per 1000 patient.years was almost similar among SGLT2i users and DPP-4i users (2.48±1.45 versus 2.67±3.09, p=0.849). Conclusion: Physicians should not fear an increased risk of LLA with SGLT2is compared with DPP-4is in daily clinical practice, even if caution may be advised in some patients exposed to special conditions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000051AmputationGliflozinMeta-analysisReal-lifeSafetySGLT2 inhibitor
spellingShingle Andre J. Scheen
Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Diabetes Epidemiology and Management
Amputation
Gliflozin
Meta-analysis
Real-life
Safety
SGLT2 inhibitor
title Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_fullStr Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full_unstemmed Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_short Lower-limb amputations in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_sort lower limb amputations in patients treated with sglt2 inhibitors versus dpp 4 inhibitors a meta analysis of observational studies
topic Amputation
Gliflozin
Meta-analysis
Real-life
Safety
SGLT2 inhibitor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000051
work_keys_str_mv AT andrejscheen lowerlimbamputationsinpatientstreatedwithsglt2inhibitorsversusdpp4inhibitorsametaanalysisofobservationalstudies