Pointing and Representing – Three Options

The aim of this paper is to explore the minimal representational requirements for pointing. One year old children are capable of pointing – what does this tell us about their representational capacities? We analyse three options: (a)  Pointing presupposes non-perceptual representations (b)  Po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Young, Angelica Kaufmann, Bence Nanay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2013-07-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/152
_version_ 1818146775463100416
author Nick Young
Angelica Kaufmann
Bence Nanay
author_facet Nick Young
Angelica Kaufmann
Bence Nanay
author_sort Nick Young
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this paper is to explore the minimal representational requirements for pointing. One year old children are capable of pointing – what does this tell us about their representational capacities? We analyse three options: (a)  Pointing presupposes non-perceptual representations (b)  Pointing does not presuppose any representation at all (c)  Pointing presupposes perceptual representations Rather than fully endorsing any of these three options, the aim of the paper is to explore the advantages and disadvantages of each.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:24:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c2b5467ae792449ca55b4cc634f23230
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1972-1293
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:24:43Z
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
record_format Article
series Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
spelling doaj.art-c2b5467ae792449ca55b4cc634f232302022-12-22T01:07:26ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932013-07-01624Pointing and Representing – Three OptionsNick Young0Angelica Kaufmann1Bence Nanay2Centre for Philosophical Psychology, Philosophy Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumCentre for Philosophical Psychology, Philosophy Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumCentre for Philosophical Psychology, Philosophy Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Peterhouse, Cambridge University, UKThe aim of this paper is to explore the minimal representational requirements for pointing. One year old children are capable of pointing – what does this tell us about their representational capacities? We analyse three options: (a)  Pointing presupposes non-perceptual representations (b)  Pointing does not presuppose any representation at all (c)  Pointing presupposes perceptual representations Rather than fully endorsing any of these three options, the aim of the paper is to explore the advantages and disadvantages of each.http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/152PointingPerceptual representationNonperceptual representation;
spellingShingle Nick Young
Angelica Kaufmann
Bence Nanay
Pointing and Representing – Three Options
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Pointing
Perceptual representation
Nonperceptual representation;
title Pointing and Representing – Three Options
title_full Pointing and Representing – Three Options
title_fullStr Pointing and Representing – Three Options
title_full_unstemmed Pointing and Representing – Three Options
title_short Pointing and Representing – Three Options
title_sort pointing and representing three options
topic Pointing
Perceptual representation
Nonperceptual representation;
url http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/152
work_keys_str_mv AT nickyoung pointingandrepresentingthreeoptions
AT angelicakaufmann pointingandrepresentingthreeoptions
AT bencenanay pointingandrepresentingthreeoptions