Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A 3‐Center Comparison of Hemodynamic and 1‐Year Outcome

Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve‐in‐Valve for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A 3‐Center Comparison of Hemodynamic and 1‐Year Outcome

Background As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to progress into younger patient populations, valve‐in‐TAVR (ViTAVR) may become a frequent consideration. Data on ViTAVR, however, are limited. This study investigated the outcome of ViTAVR in comparison to valve in surgical aor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias C. Raschpichler, Felix Woitek, Tarun Chakravarty, Nir Flint, Sung‐Han Yoon, Norman Mangner, Chinar G. Patel, Chetana Singh, Mohammad Kashif, Philip Kiefer, David Holzhey, Axel Linke, Georg Stachel, Holger Thiele, Michael A. Borger, Raj R. Makkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
aortic surgery
aortic valve replacement
structural valve deteriotation
transcutaneous aortic valve implantation
valve‐in‐valve
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.013973

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.013973

Similar Items