Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies

This paper offers a working conversation between the authors about the uneasy relationship between literacy studies and learning technologies. We come from the field of literacy studies but from contrasting perspectives: from academic literacies and work on literacies and technologies in higher educ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lesley Gourlay, Mary Hamilton, Mary Rosalind Lea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2014-01-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/download/21438/pdf_1
_version_ 1828471096889835520
author Lesley Gourlay
Mary Hamilton
Mary Rosalind Lea
author_facet Lesley Gourlay
Mary Hamilton
Mary Rosalind Lea
author_sort Lesley Gourlay
collection DOAJ
description This paper offers a working conversation between the authors about the uneasy relationship between literacy studies and learning technologies. We come from the field of literacy studies but from contrasting perspectives: from academic literacies and work on literacies and technologies in higher education; from an interest in media theory and the implications of digital mediation for the contemporary university; from everyday literacies in informal settings and a concern for the gaps between policy and practice. We illustrate our perspectives through reference to post-compulsory education, especially higher education, but intend our arguments to be of broader value to all sectors of education and learning. We argue that it is probably inevitable that terms such as literacy/digital/network will be taken up by different arenas of scholarship and practice to mean different things, but what is important is finding spaces to make visible the embedded and implicit understandings, assumptions and ideological positions that are carried by these terms. In the paper, we attempt to lay bare some of the tendencies in the different approaches and argue the case for building on these differences in our work rather than seeing them as paradigm contests. We suggest that it would be more generative to the field to acknowledge the richness and diversity of these different traditions, rather than attempting the impossible task of forcing them into a superficial reconciliation.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:06:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-c71256167d664533b51b6721132a3092
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2156-7069
2156-7077
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:06:16Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Association for Learning Technology
record_format Article
series Research in Learning Technology
spelling doaj.art-c71256167d664533b51b6721132a30922022-12-22T01:20:02ZengAssociation for Learning TechnologyResearch in Learning Technology2156-70692156-70772014-01-0121011310.3402/rlt.v21.2143821438Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literaciesLesley Gourlay0Mary Hamilton1Mary Rosalind Lea2 Institute of Education, UK University of Lancaster, UK Institute of Educational Technology, Open University, UKThis paper offers a working conversation between the authors about the uneasy relationship between literacy studies and learning technologies. We come from the field of literacy studies but from contrasting perspectives: from academic literacies and work on literacies and technologies in higher education; from an interest in media theory and the implications of digital mediation for the contemporary university; from everyday literacies in informal settings and a concern for the gaps between policy and practice. We illustrate our perspectives through reference to post-compulsory education, especially higher education, but intend our arguments to be of broader value to all sectors of education and learning. We argue that it is probably inevitable that terms such as literacy/digital/network will be taken up by different arenas of scholarship and practice to mean different things, but what is important is finding spaces to make visible the embedded and implicit understandings, assumptions and ideological positions that are carried by these terms. In the paper, we attempt to lay bare some of the tendencies in the different approaches and argue the case for building on these differences in our work rather than seeing them as paradigm contests. We suggest that it would be more generative to the field to acknowledge the richness and diversity of these different traditions, rather than attempting the impossible task of forcing them into a superficial reconciliation.http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/download/21438/pdf_1literaciesdigitaltextual practiceslearning landscapesethnographic
spellingShingle Lesley Gourlay
Mary Hamilton
Mary Rosalind Lea
Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
Research in Learning Technology
literacies
digital
textual practices
learning landscapes
ethnographic
title Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
title_full Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
title_fullStr Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
title_full_unstemmed Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
title_short Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: messing with digital literacies
title_sort textual practices in the new media digital landscape messing with digital literacies
topic literacies
digital
textual practices
learning landscapes
ethnographic
url http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/download/21438/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT lesleygourlay textualpracticesinthenewmediadigitallandscapemessingwithdigitalliteracies
AT maryhamilton textualpracticesinthenewmediadigitallandscapemessingwithdigitalliteracies
AT maryrosalindlea textualpracticesinthenewmediadigitallandscapemessingwithdigitalliteracies