Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels

The poultry industry in the United States has traditionally implemented non-chemical and chemical interventions against <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. on the basis of experience and word-of-mouth information shared among poultry processors. The effects o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan F. De Villena, David A. Vargas, Rossy Bueno López, Daniela R. Chávez-Velado, Diego E. Casas, Reagan L. Jiménez, Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/6/775
_version_ 1797471676544319488
author Juan F. De Villena
David A. Vargas
Rossy Bueno López
Daniela R. Chávez-Velado
Diego E. Casas
Reagan L. Jiménez
Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata
author_facet Juan F. De Villena
David A. Vargas
Rossy Bueno López
Daniela R. Chávez-Velado
Diego E. Casas
Reagan L. Jiménez
Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata
author_sort Juan F. De Villena
collection DOAJ
description The poultry industry in the United States has traditionally implemented non-chemical and chemical interventions against <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. on the basis of experience and word-of-mouth information shared among poultry processors. The effects of individual interventions have been assessed with microbiological testing methods for <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. prevalence as well as quantification of indicator organisms, such as aerobic plate counts (APC), to demonstrate efficacy. The current study evaluated the loads of both indicators and pathogens in a commercial chicken processing facility, comparing the “normal chemical”, with all chemical interventions turned-on, at typical chemical concentrations set by the processing plant versus low-chemical process (“reduced chemical”), where all interventions were turned off or reduced to the minimum concentrations considered in the facility’s HACCP system. Enumeration and prevalence of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. as well as indicator organisms (APC and Enterobacteriaceae—EB) enumeration were evaluated to compare both treatments throughout a 25-month sampling period. Ten locations were selected in the current bio-mapping study, including live receiving, rehanger, post eviscerator, post cropper, post neck breaker, post IOBW #1, post IOBW #2, prechilling, post chilling, and parts (wings). Statistical process control parameters for each location and processing schemes were developed for each pathogen and indicator evaluated. Despite demonstrating significant statistical differences between the normal and naked processes in <i>Salmonella</i> spp. counts (“normal” significantly lower counts than the “reduced” at each location except for post-eviscerator and post-cropper locations), the prevalence of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. after chilling is comparable on both treatments (~10%), whereas for <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. counts, only at the parts’ location was there significant statistical difference between the “normal chemical” and the “reduced chemical”. Therefore, not all chemical intervention locations show an overall impact on <i>Salmonella</i> spp. or <i>Campylobacter</i> spp., and certain interventions can be turned off to achieve the same or better microbial performance if strategic intervention locations are enhanced.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:51:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ca79935495a04993836d822d9d245a1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:51:34Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-ca79935495a04993836d822d9d245a1c2023-11-24T01:09:42ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582022-03-0111677510.3390/foods11060775Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention LevelsJuan F. De Villena0David A. Vargas1Rossy Bueno López2Daniela R. Chávez-Velado3Diego E. Casas4Reagan L. Jiménez5Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata6International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAInternational Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAThe poultry industry in the United States has traditionally implemented non-chemical and chemical interventions against <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. on the basis of experience and word-of-mouth information shared among poultry processors. The effects of individual interventions have been assessed with microbiological testing methods for <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. prevalence as well as quantification of indicator organisms, such as aerobic plate counts (APC), to demonstrate efficacy. The current study evaluated the loads of both indicators and pathogens in a commercial chicken processing facility, comparing the “normal chemical”, with all chemical interventions turned-on, at typical chemical concentrations set by the processing plant versus low-chemical process (“reduced chemical”), where all interventions were turned off or reduced to the minimum concentrations considered in the facility’s HACCP system. Enumeration and prevalence of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. as well as indicator organisms (APC and Enterobacteriaceae—EB) enumeration were evaluated to compare both treatments throughout a 25-month sampling period. Ten locations were selected in the current bio-mapping study, including live receiving, rehanger, post eviscerator, post cropper, post neck breaker, post IOBW #1, post IOBW #2, prechilling, post chilling, and parts (wings). Statistical process control parameters for each location and processing schemes were developed for each pathogen and indicator evaluated. Despite demonstrating significant statistical differences between the normal and naked processes in <i>Salmonella</i> spp. counts (“normal” significantly lower counts than the “reduced” at each location except for post-eviscerator and post-cropper locations), the prevalence of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. after chilling is comparable on both treatments (~10%), whereas for <i>Campylobacter</i> spp. counts, only at the parts’ location was there significant statistical difference between the “normal chemical” and the “reduced chemical”. Therefore, not all chemical intervention locations show an overall impact on <i>Salmonella</i> spp. or <i>Campylobacter</i> spp., and certain interventions can be turned off to achieve the same or better microbial performance if strategic intervention locations are enhanced.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/6/775poultry bio-mappingchemical interventions<i>Salmonella</i> enumeration<i>Campylobacter</i> enumeration
spellingShingle Juan F. De Villena
David A. Vargas
Rossy Bueno López
Daniela R. Chávez-Velado
Diego E. Casas
Reagan L. Jiménez
Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata
Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
Foods
poultry bio-mapping
chemical interventions
<i>Salmonella</i> enumeration
<i>Campylobacter</i> enumeration
title Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
title_full Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
title_fullStr Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
title_full_unstemmed Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
title_short Bio-Mapping Indicators and Pathogen Loads in a Commercial Broiler Processing Facility Operating with High and Low Antimicrobial Intervention Levels
title_sort bio mapping indicators and pathogen loads in a commercial broiler processing facility operating with high and low antimicrobial intervention levels
topic poultry bio-mapping
chemical interventions
<i>Salmonella</i> enumeration
<i>Campylobacter</i> enumeration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/6/775
work_keys_str_mv AT juanfdevillena biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT davidavargas biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT rossybuenolopez biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT danielarchavezvelado biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT diegoecasas biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT reaganljimenez biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels
AT marcosxsanchezplata biomappingindicatorsandpathogenloadsinacommercialbroilerprocessingfacilityoperatingwithhighandlowantimicrobialinterventionlevels