Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome

In the pursuit of increasing sustainability, climate change resiliency and independence of synthetic pesticides in agriculture, the interest of consumers and producers in organic and biodynamic farming has been steadily increasing in recent decennia. This is, in particular, the case for the vitivini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus Rienth, Frederic Lamy, Clément Chessex, Heger Thierry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Viticulture and Enology Society 2023-02-01
Series:OENO One
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/7218
_version_ 1811161514703323136
author Markus Rienth
Frederic Lamy
Clément Chessex
Heger Thierry
author_facet Markus Rienth
Frederic Lamy
Clément Chessex
Heger Thierry
author_sort Markus Rienth
collection DOAJ
description In the pursuit of increasing sustainability, climate change resiliency and independence of synthetic pesticides in agriculture, the interest of consumers and producers in organic and biodynamic farming has been steadily increasing in recent decennia. This is, in particular, the case for the vitivinicultural industry in Europe, where more and more producers are converting from organic to biodynamic farming. However, clear scientific evidence showing that biodynamic farming improves vine physiology, vine stress resilience, soil quality related parameters and berry or wine quality is still lacking, despite the growing number of research studies on this issue. To investigate whether biodynamic farming methods have an impact on vine physiology, berry quality and the environment, a five-year experiment was set up in 2016 in a commercial vineyard in Switzerland. In this trial, the two main biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 were applied and compared to an organic control. Vine and berry physiology (net photosynthesis, vigour, sugar, organic acids, berry weight, yield) were assessed from 2016 to 2020. Soil physical properties (soil bulk density, water holding capacity, soil structural stability, macropore volume) were analysed from 2017-2020, and, soil fungal communities were analysed by DNA-sequencing in the last year of the experiment (2020).  None of the parameters related to vine and berry physiology showed significant differences throughout the duration of the experiments, except photosynthesis, which was higher when biodynamic preparations were applied at one time point. Similarly, the soil’s physical properties were not influenced by the application of the two biodynamic preparations in all years. Regarding the soil microbiome, the preparations 500 and 501 neither led to significant differences in fungal diversity nor seemed to impact the soil fungal communities. The present study confirms previous findings of different research teams that did not observe significant differences between organic and biodynamic farming methods in terms of observed soil and vine parameters.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:16:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cd059ce9a821487db82f31ac04c425d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2494-1271
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:16:40Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher International Viticulture and Enology Society
record_format Article
series OENO One
spelling doaj.art-cd059ce9a821487db82f31ac04c425d02023-03-02T07:37:46ZengInternational Viticulture and Enology SocietyOENO One2494-12712023-02-0157110.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.7218Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiomeMarkus Rienth0Frederic Lamy1Clément Chessex2Heger Thierry3University of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland, Changins College for Viticulture and Enology, route de Duillier 60, 1260 NyonUniversity of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland, Changins College for Viticulture and Enology, route de Duillier 60, 1260 NyonUniversity of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland, Changins College for Viticulture and Enology, route de Duillier 60, 1260 NyonUniversity of Sciences and Art Western Switzerland, Changins College for Viticulture and Enology, route de Duillier 60, 1260 NyonIn the pursuit of increasing sustainability, climate change resiliency and independence of synthetic pesticides in agriculture, the interest of consumers and producers in organic and biodynamic farming has been steadily increasing in recent decennia. This is, in particular, the case for the vitivinicultural industry in Europe, where more and more producers are converting from organic to biodynamic farming. However, clear scientific evidence showing that biodynamic farming improves vine physiology, vine stress resilience, soil quality related parameters and berry or wine quality is still lacking, despite the growing number of research studies on this issue. To investigate whether biodynamic farming methods have an impact on vine physiology, berry quality and the environment, a five-year experiment was set up in 2016 in a commercial vineyard in Switzerland. In this trial, the two main biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 were applied and compared to an organic control. Vine and berry physiology (net photosynthesis, vigour, sugar, organic acids, berry weight, yield) were assessed from 2016 to 2020. Soil physical properties (soil bulk density, water holding capacity, soil structural stability, macropore volume) were analysed from 2017-2020, and, soil fungal communities were analysed by DNA-sequencing in the last year of the experiment (2020).  None of the parameters related to vine and berry physiology showed significant differences throughout the duration of the experiments, except photosynthesis, which was higher when biodynamic preparations were applied at one time point. Similarly, the soil’s physical properties were not influenced by the application of the two biodynamic preparations in all years. Regarding the soil microbiome, the preparations 500 and 501 neither led to significant differences in fungal diversity nor seemed to impact the soil fungal communities. The present study confirms previous findings of different research teams that did not observe significant differences between organic and biodynamic farming methods in terms of observed soil and vine parameters. https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/7218biodynamic viticulturemicrobial diversityorganic viticulturepreparations 500 and 501soil physical propertiesvine physiology
spellingShingle Markus Rienth
Frederic Lamy
Clément Chessex
Heger Thierry
Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
OENO One
biodynamic viticulture
microbial diversity
organic viticulture
preparations 500 and 501
soil physical properties
vine physiology
title Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
title_full Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
title_fullStr Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
title_short Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome
title_sort effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology pedology and the soil microbiome
topic biodynamic viticulture
microbial diversity
organic viticulture
preparations 500 and 501
soil physical properties
vine physiology
url https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/7218
work_keys_str_mv AT markusrienth effectsofbiodynamicpreparations500and501onvineandberryphysiologypedologyandthesoilmicrobiome
AT fredericlamy effectsofbiodynamicpreparations500and501onvineandberryphysiologypedologyandthesoilmicrobiome
AT clementchessex effectsofbiodynamicpreparations500and501onvineandberryphysiologypedologyandthesoilmicrobiome
AT hegerthierry effectsofbiodynamicpreparations500and501onvineandberryphysiologypedologyandthesoilmicrobiome