Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices

Driven by the rise of recent technologies and long-standing interest in accommodating diverse student needs, the demand for flexibility in higher education has intensified. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has intensified studies investigating online learning effects, reflecting shifting preferences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asil El Galad, Dean Harvey Betts, Nicole Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347432/full
_version_ 1797201690588348416
author Asil El Galad
Dean Harvey Betts
Nicole Campbell
author_facet Asil El Galad
Dean Harvey Betts
Nicole Campbell
author_sort Asil El Galad
collection DOAJ
description Driven by the rise of recent technologies and long-standing interest in accommodating diverse student needs, the demand for flexibility in higher education has intensified. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has intensified studies investigating online learning effects, reflecting shifting preferences and demands in education. Although prior research recognizes diverse flexibility practices, a narrow focus on instructional delivery limits its potential. Bridging this gap requires re-envisioning flexible learning by involving students, educators, and institutions in the transformation process. Therefore, this study aims to investigate and compare students’ and educators’ perspectives and experiences of five dimensions of flexibility (deadlines, modality, assessment type, grading and weighting, and course correspondence). The study involves a quantitative and qualitative survey, composed of Likert scale and open-ended questions. The survey respondents were students (N = 315) and educators (N = 100) at Western University across different years and programs. The quantitative component reveals a general alignment between student and educator preferences across flexibility dimensions. Noteworthy preferences include collaborative deadline setting, non-timed and take-home assessments, and more frequent, lower-weighted tasks. Students’ increased preference for hybrid learning, despite a general preference for in-person formats, underscores the value placed on flexibility and adaptability. Qualitative findings illuminate the broader implications of flexibility that can be organized into the following four themes: (1) flexibility humanizes teaching and learning, (2) flexibility recognizes diverse student populations, (3) flexibility provides broad accommodation and increases accessibility, and (4) flexibility can offer immediate relief but poses long-term consequences. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the multifaceted nature of flexibility in higher education, offering a nuanced understanding of the impact of flexibility on students, educators, and institutions, encouraging further exploration and evidence-based policy decisions. Beyond academia, the research suggests potential reshaping of the higher education landscape, positioning flexibility as a fundamental element to foster a more inclusive, supportive, and effective learning environment for both students and educators.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T07:51:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cfff048df18b43ebafe943464dfc4fa1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-284X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T07:51:33Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj.art-cfff048df18b43ebafe943464dfc4fa12024-04-18T11:02:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2024-04-01910.3389/feduc.2024.13474321347432Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practicesAsil El GaladDean Harvey BettsNicole CampbellDriven by the rise of recent technologies and long-standing interest in accommodating diverse student needs, the demand for flexibility in higher education has intensified. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has intensified studies investigating online learning effects, reflecting shifting preferences and demands in education. Although prior research recognizes diverse flexibility practices, a narrow focus on instructional delivery limits its potential. Bridging this gap requires re-envisioning flexible learning by involving students, educators, and institutions in the transformation process. Therefore, this study aims to investigate and compare students’ and educators’ perspectives and experiences of five dimensions of flexibility (deadlines, modality, assessment type, grading and weighting, and course correspondence). The study involves a quantitative and qualitative survey, composed of Likert scale and open-ended questions. The survey respondents were students (N = 315) and educators (N = 100) at Western University across different years and programs. The quantitative component reveals a general alignment between student and educator preferences across flexibility dimensions. Noteworthy preferences include collaborative deadline setting, non-timed and take-home assessments, and more frequent, lower-weighted tasks. Students’ increased preference for hybrid learning, despite a general preference for in-person formats, underscores the value placed on flexibility and adaptability. Qualitative findings illuminate the broader implications of flexibility that can be organized into the following four themes: (1) flexibility humanizes teaching and learning, (2) flexibility recognizes diverse student populations, (3) flexibility provides broad accommodation and increases accessibility, and (4) flexibility can offer immediate relief but poses long-term consequences. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the multifaceted nature of flexibility in higher education, offering a nuanced understanding of the impact of flexibility on students, educators, and institutions, encouraging further exploration and evidence-based policy decisions. Beyond academia, the research suggests potential reshaping of the higher education landscape, positioning flexibility as a fundamental element to foster a more inclusive, supportive, and effective learning environment for both students and educators.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347432/fullflexibilityhigher educationperspectivesstudentseducators
spellingShingle Asil El Galad
Dean Harvey Betts
Nicole Campbell
Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
Frontiers in Education
flexibility
higher education
perspectives
students
educators
title Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
title_full Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
title_fullStr Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
title_full_unstemmed Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
title_short Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices
title_sort flexible learning dimensions in higher education aligning students and educators perspectives for more inclusive practices
topic flexibility
higher education
perspectives
students
educators
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347432/full
work_keys_str_mv AT asilelgalad flexiblelearningdimensionsinhighereducationaligningstudentsandeducatorsperspectivesformoreinclusivepractices
AT deanharveybetts flexiblelearningdimensionsinhighereducationaligningstudentsandeducatorsperspectivesformoreinclusivepractices
AT nicolecampbell flexiblelearningdimensionsinhighereducationaligningstudentsandeducatorsperspectivesformoreinclusivepractices