The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire

IntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felicity Roux, Sharyn Burns, HuiJun Chih, Jacqueline Hendriks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/full
_version_ 1818231262931845120
author Felicity Roux
Sharyn Burns
HuiJun Chih
Jacqueline Hendriks
author_facet Felicity Roux
Sharyn Burns
HuiJun Chih
Jacqueline Hendriks
author_sort Felicity Roux
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-five purposively selected professionals from the diverse professions of health and education. The panellists were tasked to inform the development of a school-based OM health literacy resources.ResultsIn Round One, 86% of panellists determined the scope of these resources using guided and open-ended questions. The study then split into two phases which ran concurrently. In the first phase informing the intervention's development, 57% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 29% reviewed selected lessons. In the second phase informing the questionnaire's development, 51% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 69% in Round Three. The overall consensus reached for the intervention phase and questionnaire phase were 82% and 84%, respectively. The Panel's recommendations included a strengths-based position to counter menstrual stigma, teaching accurate self-report of cycle biomarkers, addressing multiple menstrual dysfunctions and adopting a whole-school approach.ConclusionAlthough time-consuming and requiring a sustained interest, this two-phase Delphi methodology offered anonymity to panellists from distinct professions which facilitated their independent contribution to developing OM health literacy school resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T10:47:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0faad71ad6a4cc99a15bdb60994228d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-5059
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T10:47:36Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Global Women's Health
spelling doaj.art-d0faad71ad6a4cc99a15bdb60994228d2022-12-22T00:26:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Global Women's Health2673-50592022-05-01310.3389/fgwh.2022.826805826805The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and QuestionnaireFelicity RouxSharyn BurnsHuiJun ChihJacqueline HendriksIntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-five purposively selected professionals from the diverse professions of health and education. The panellists were tasked to inform the development of a school-based OM health literacy resources.ResultsIn Round One, 86% of panellists determined the scope of these resources using guided and open-ended questions. The study then split into two phases which ran concurrently. In the first phase informing the intervention's development, 57% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 29% reviewed selected lessons. In the second phase informing the questionnaire's development, 51% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 69% in Round Three. The overall consensus reached for the intervention phase and questionnaire phase were 82% and 84%, respectively. The Panel's recommendations included a strengths-based position to counter menstrual stigma, teaching accurate self-report of cycle biomarkers, addressing multiple menstrual dysfunctions and adopting a whole-school approach.ConclusionAlthough time-consuming and requiring a sustained interest, this two-phase Delphi methodology offered anonymity to panellists from distinct professions which facilitated their independent contribution to developing OM health literacy school resources.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/fullDelphimenstrual cyclefertilityhealth literacyhealth promoting school modeladolescent girls
spellingShingle Felicity Roux
Sharyn Burns
HuiJun Chih
Jacqueline Hendriks
The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Delphi
menstrual cycle
fertility
health literacy
health promoting school model
adolescent girls
title The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
title_full The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
title_fullStr The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
title_short The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
title_sort use of a two phase online delphi panel methodology to inform the concurrent development of a school based ovulatory menstrual health literacy intervention and questionnaire
topic Delphi
menstrual cycle
fertility
health literacy
health promoting school model
adolescent girls
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/full
work_keys_str_mv AT felicityroux theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT sharynburns theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT huijunchih theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT jacquelinehendriks theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT felicityroux useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT sharynburns useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT huijunchih useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire
AT jacquelinehendriks useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire