The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire
IntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-f...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Global Women's Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/full |
_version_ | 1818231262931845120 |
---|---|
author | Felicity Roux Sharyn Burns HuiJun Chih Jacqueline Hendriks |
author_facet | Felicity Roux Sharyn Burns HuiJun Chih Jacqueline Hendriks |
author_sort | Felicity Roux |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-five purposively selected professionals from the diverse professions of health and education. The panellists were tasked to inform the development of a school-based OM health literacy resources.ResultsIn Round One, 86% of panellists determined the scope of these resources using guided and open-ended questions. The study then split into two phases which ran concurrently. In the first phase informing the intervention's development, 57% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 29% reviewed selected lessons. In the second phase informing the questionnaire's development, 51% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 69% in Round Three. The overall consensus reached for the intervention phase and questionnaire phase were 82% and 84%, respectively. The Panel's recommendations included a strengths-based position to counter menstrual stigma, teaching accurate self-report of cycle biomarkers, addressing multiple menstrual dysfunctions and adopting a whole-school approach.ConclusionAlthough time-consuming and requiring a sustained interest, this two-phase Delphi methodology offered anonymity to panellists from distinct professions which facilitated their independent contribution to developing OM health literacy school resources. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:47:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d0faad71ad6a4cc99a15bdb60994228d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2673-5059 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T10:47:36Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Global Women's Health |
spelling | doaj.art-d0faad71ad6a4cc99a15bdb60994228d2022-12-22T00:26:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Global Women's Health2673-50592022-05-01310.3389/fgwh.2022.826805826805The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and QuestionnaireFelicity RouxSharyn BurnsHuiJun ChihJacqueline HendriksIntroductionThere are a high prevalence of ovulatory-menstrual (OM) dysfunction and low levels of menstrual health literacy in adolescents, yet few evidence-based OM health education resources for schools.MethodThis two-phase study used an online Delphi methodology to build consensus across thirty-five purposively selected professionals from the diverse professions of health and education. The panellists were tasked to inform the development of a school-based OM health literacy resources.ResultsIn Round One, 86% of panellists determined the scope of these resources using guided and open-ended questions. The study then split into two phases which ran concurrently. In the first phase informing the intervention's development, 57% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 29% reviewed selected lessons. In the second phase informing the questionnaire's development, 51% of panellists participated in Round Two, and 69% in Round Three. The overall consensus reached for the intervention phase and questionnaire phase were 82% and 84%, respectively. The Panel's recommendations included a strengths-based position to counter menstrual stigma, teaching accurate self-report of cycle biomarkers, addressing multiple menstrual dysfunctions and adopting a whole-school approach.ConclusionAlthough time-consuming and requiring a sustained interest, this two-phase Delphi methodology offered anonymity to panellists from distinct professions which facilitated their independent contribution to developing OM health literacy school resources.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/fullDelphimenstrual cyclefertilityhealth literacyhealth promoting school modeladolescent girls |
spellingShingle | Felicity Roux Sharyn Burns HuiJun Chih Jacqueline Hendriks The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire Frontiers in Global Women's Health Delphi menstrual cycle fertility health literacy health promoting school model adolescent girls |
title | The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire |
title_full | The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire |
title_short | The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire |
title_sort | use of a two phase online delphi panel methodology to inform the concurrent development of a school based ovulatory menstrual health literacy intervention and questionnaire |
topic | Delphi menstrual cycle fertility health literacy health promoting school model adolescent girls |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.826805/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT felicityroux theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT sharynburns theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT huijunchih theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT jacquelinehendriks theuseofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT felicityroux useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT sharynburns useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT huijunchih useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire AT jacquelinehendriks useofatwophaseonlinedelphipanelmethodologytoinformtheconcurrentdevelopmentofaschoolbasedovulatorymenstrualhealthliteracyinterventionandquestionnaire |