Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate hypotheses in specific contexts and are often considered the gold standard of evidence for infectious disease interventions, but their results cannot immediately generalize to other contexts (e.g., different populations, interventions, or disease burdens)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew F Brouwer, Marisa C Eisenberg, Kevin M Bakker, Savannah N Boerger, Mondal H Zahid, Matthew C Freeman, Joseph N S Eisenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-12-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010748
_version_ 1797974014628462592
author Andrew F Brouwer
Marisa C Eisenberg
Kevin M Bakker
Savannah N Boerger
Mondal H Zahid
Matthew C Freeman
Joseph N S Eisenberg
author_facet Andrew F Brouwer
Marisa C Eisenberg
Kevin M Bakker
Savannah N Boerger
Mondal H Zahid
Matthew C Freeman
Joseph N S Eisenberg
author_sort Andrew F Brouwer
collection DOAJ
description Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate hypotheses in specific contexts and are often considered the gold standard of evidence for infectious disease interventions, but their results cannot immediately generalize to other contexts (e.g., different populations, interventions, or disease burdens). Mechanistic models are one approach to generalizing findings between contexts, but infectious disease transmission models (IDTMs) are not immediately suited for analyzing RCTs, since they often rely on time-series surveillance data. We developed an IDTM framework to explain relative risk outcomes of an infectious disease RCT and applied it to a water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) RCT. This model can generalize the RCT results to other contexts and conditions. We developed this compartmental IDTM framework to account for key WASH RCT factors: i) transmission across multiple environmental pathways, ii) multiple interventions applied individually and in combination, iii) adherence to interventions or preexisting conditions, and iv) the impact of individuals not enrolled in the study. We employed a hybrid sampling and estimation framework to obtain posterior estimates of mechanistic parameter sets consistent with empirical outcomes. We illustrated our model using WASH Benefits Bangladesh RCT data (n = 17,187). Our model reproduced reported diarrheal prevalence in this RCT. The baseline estimate of the basic reproduction number [Formula: see text] for the control arm (1.10, 95% CrI: 1.07, 1.16) corresponded to an endemic prevalence of 9.5% (95% CrI: 7.4, 13.7%) in the absence of interventions or preexisting WASH conditions. No single pathway was likely able to sustain transmission: pathway-specific [Formula: see text] for water, fomites, and all other pathways were 0.42 (95% CrI: 0.03, 0.97), 0.20 (95% CrI: 0.02, 0.59), and 0.48 (95% CrI: 0.02, 0.94), respectively. An IDTM approach to evaluating RCTs can complement RCT analysis by providing a rigorous framework for generating data-driven hypotheses that explain trial findings, particularly unexpected null results, opening up existing data to deeper epidemiological understanding.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:13:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d17b83a76ceb4082b14115783dca4435
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:13:23Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj.art-d17b83a76ceb4082b14115783dca44352023-01-01T05:31:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582022-12-011812e101074810.1371/journal.pcbi.1010748Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.Andrew F BrouwerMarisa C EisenbergKevin M BakkerSavannah N BoergerMondal H ZahidMatthew C FreemanJoseph N S EisenbergRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate hypotheses in specific contexts and are often considered the gold standard of evidence for infectious disease interventions, but their results cannot immediately generalize to other contexts (e.g., different populations, interventions, or disease burdens). Mechanistic models are one approach to generalizing findings between contexts, but infectious disease transmission models (IDTMs) are not immediately suited for analyzing RCTs, since they often rely on time-series surveillance data. We developed an IDTM framework to explain relative risk outcomes of an infectious disease RCT and applied it to a water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) RCT. This model can generalize the RCT results to other contexts and conditions. We developed this compartmental IDTM framework to account for key WASH RCT factors: i) transmission across multiple environmental pathways, ii) multiple interventions applied individually and in combination, iii) adherence to interventions or preexisting conditions, and iv) the impact of individuals not enrolled in the study. We employed a hybrid sampling and estimation framework to obtain posterior estimates of mechanistic parameter sets consistent with empirical outcomes. We illustrated our model using WASH Benefits Bangladesh RCT data (n = 17,187). Our model reproduced reported diarrheal prevalence in this RCT. The baseline estimate of the basic reproduction number [Formula: see text] for the control arm (1.10, 95% CrI: 1.07, 1.16) corresponded to an endemic prevalence of 9.5% (95% CrI: 7.4, 13.7%) in the absence of interventions or preexisting WASH conditions. No single pathway was likely able to sustain transmission: pathway-specific [Formula: see text] for water, fomites, and all other pathways were 0.42 (95% CrI: 0.03, 0.97), 0.20 (95% CrI: 0.02, 0.59), and 0.48 (95% CrI: 0.02, 0.94), respectively. An IDTM approach to evaluating RCTs can complement RCT analysis by providing a rigorous framework for generating data-driven hypotheses that explain trial findings, particularly unexpected null results, opening up existing data to deeper epidemiological understanding.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010748
spellingShingle Andrew F Brouwer
Marisa C Eisenberg
Kevin M Bakker
Savannah N Boerger
Mondal H Zahid
Matthew C Freeman
Joseph N S Eisenberg
Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
title_full Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
title_fullStr Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
title_short Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: Controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions.
title_sort leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water sanitation and hygiene interventions
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010748
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewfbrouwer leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT marisaceisenberg leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT kevinmbakker leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT savannahnboerger leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT mondalhzahid leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT matthewcfreeman leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions
AT josephnseisenberg leveraginginfectiousdiseasemodelstointerpretrandomizedcontrolledtrialscontrollingentericpathogentransmissionthroughwatersanitationandhygieneinterventions