Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates
The Mesolithic settlements on the left bank of the Danube in the Iron Gates have yielded numerous artefacts made of osseous materials. Products and sub-products of the chaîne opératoire are present, suggesting in situ manufacturing of the finished items. Among a restricted range of artefact types, t...
| Prif Awduron: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | Erthygl |
| Iaith: | English |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
De Gruyter
2023-06-01
|
| Cyfres: | Open Archaeology |
| Pynciau: | |
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0298 |
| _version_ | 1827922380688719872 |
|---|---|
| author | Mărgărit Monica Boroneanț Adina Bălășescu Adrian Bonsall Clive |
| author_facet | Mărgărit Monica Boroneanț Adina Bălășescu Adrian Bonsall Clive |
| author_sort | Mărgărit Monica |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Mesolithic settlements on the left bank of the Danube in the Iron Gates have yielded numerous artefacts made of osseous materials. Products and sub-products of the chaîne opératoire are present, suggesting in situ manufacturing of the finished items. Among a restricted range of artefact types, the most characteristic ones are bevelled tools made of antler, pointed tools of bone, and boar tusk scrapers. Our research has focused on identifying both the manufacturing processes applied to the various raw materials and the marks left by use, which are key indicators of the function of the artefacts. We were also interested to know if a unitary technological scheme could be identified throughout the Iron Gates, or if there are features specific to individual sites. Our findings suggest that despite a general unitary pattern, it is nevertheless possible to identify elements that are characteristic of individual sites but whether these were the result of economic or cultural factors is more difficult to assess. The results of this combined approach suggest wood processing and hunting were among the main activities performed with osseous artefacts. Contrary to some previous interpretations, there is no evidence for their use in connection with plant cultivation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:41:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d1af2b9a440b4d24b32dfb933c5e2a2c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2300-6560 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:41:49Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Archaeology |
| spelling | doaj.art-d1af2b9a440b4d24b32dfb933c5e2a2c2023-06-19T05:53:41ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602023-06-0191pp. 658010.1515/opar-2022-0298Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron GatesMărgărit Monica0Boroneanț Adina1Bălășescu Adrian2Bonsall Clive3Doctoral School of Economics and Humanities, Valahia University of Târgoviște, 34-36 Lt. Stancu Ion St., Târgoviște, RomaniaPalaeolithic Department, “Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, 11 Henri Coandă St., Bucharest, RomaniaBioarchaeology Department, “Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, 11 Henri Coandă St., Bucharest, RomaniaSchool of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, EdinburghEH8 9AG, United KingdomThe Mesolithic settlements on the left bank of the Danube in the Iron Gates have yielded numerous artefacts made of osseous materials. Products and sub-products of the chaîne opératoire are present, suggesting in situ manufacturing of the finished items. Among a restricted range of artefact types, the most characteristic ones are bevelled tools made of antler, pointed tools of bone, and boar tusk scrapers. Our research has focused on identifying both the manufacturing processes applied to the various raw materials and the marks left by use, which are key indicators of the function of the artefacts. We were also interested to know if a unitary technological scheme could be identified throughout the Iron Gates, or if there are features specific to individual sites. Our findings suggest that despite a general unitary pattern, it is nevertheless possible to identify elements that are characteristic of individual sites but whether these were the result of economic or cultural factors is more difficult to assess. The results of this combined approach suggest wood processing and hunting were among the main activities performed with osseous artefacts. Contrary to some previous interpretations, there is no evidence for their use in connection with plant cultivation.https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0298iron gatesraw materialsmanufacturingfunctionregional and temporal variation |
| spellingShingle | Mărgărit Monica Boroneanț Adina Bălășescu Adrian Bonsall Clive Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates Open Archaeology iron gates raw materials manufacturing function regional and temporal variation |
| title | Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates |
| title_full | Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates |
| title_fullStr | Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates |
| title_short | Exploitation of Osseous Materials During the Mesolithic in the Iron Gates |
| title_sort | exploitation of osseous materials during the mesolithic in the iron gates |
| topic | iron gates raw materials manufacturing function regional and temporal variation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0298 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT margaritmonica exploitationofosseousmaterialsduringthemesolithicintheirongates AT boroneantadina exploitationofosseousmaterialsduringthemesolithicintheirongates AT balasescuadrian exploitationofosseousmaterialsduringthemesolithicintheirongates AT bonsallclive exploitationofosseousmaterialsduringthemesolithicintheirongates |