The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production.
The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research para...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5945011?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1818934270658347008 |
---|---|
author | Ruben D Vromans Suzanne R Jongman |
author_facet | Ruben D Vromans Suzanne R Jongman |
author_sort | Ruben D Vromans |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T05:01:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d1d94f6b97354268b8ba0437e2091fc8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T05:01:37Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-d1d94f6b97354268b8ba0437e2091fc82022-12-21T19:52:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01135e019731310.1371/journal.pone.0197313The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production.Ruben D VromansSuzanne R JongmanThe present study investigated the interplay between selective inhibition (the ability to suppress specific competing responses) and nonselective inhibition (the ability to suppress any inappropriate response) during single word production. To this end, we combined two well-established research paradigms: the picture-word interference task and the stop-signal task. Selective inhibition was assessed by instructing participants to name target pictures (e.g., dog) in the presence of semantically related (e.g., cat) or unrelated (e.g., window) distractor words. Nonselective inhibition was tested by occasionally presenting a visual stop-signal, indicating that participants should withhold their verbal response. The stop-signal was presented early (250 ms) aimed at interrupting the lexical selection stage, and late (325 ms) to influence the word-encoding stage of the speech production process. We found longer naming latencies for pictures with semantically related distractors than with unrelated distractors (semantic interference effect). The results further showed that, at both delays, stopping latencies (i.e., stop-signal RTs) were prolonged for naming pictures with semantically related distractors compared to pictures with unrelated distractors. Taken together, our findings suggest that selective and nonselective inhibition, at least partly, share a common inhibitory mechanism during different stages of the speech production process.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5945011?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Ruben D Vromans Suzanne R Jongman The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. PLoS ONE |
title | The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. |
title_full | The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. |
title_fullStr | The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. |
title_full_unstemmed | The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. |
title_short | The interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production. |
title_sort | interplay between selective and nonselective inhibition during single word production |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5945011?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubendvromans theinterplaybetweenselectiveandnonselectiveinhibitionduringsinglewordproduction AT suzannerjongman theinterplaybetweenselectiveandnonselectiveinhibitionduringsinglewordproduction AT rubendvromans interplaybetweenselectiveandnonselectiveinhibitionduringsinglewordproduction AT suzannerjongman interplaybetweenselectiveandnonselectiveinhibitionduringsinglewordproduction |