Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biofilm-forming ability and the resistance of planktonic cells and biofilm to methicillin (MIC and MBC, and log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> reduction, respectively). Thirty-four isolates were used, including coagulase-positive <i>Staphylococcus</...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Acácio Salamandane, Jussara Correia, Belo Afonso Muetanene, Madalena dos Santos, Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira, Luísa Brito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/13/7725
_version_ 1827735166879006720
author Acácio Salamandane
Jussara Correia
Belo Afonso Muetanene
Madalena dos Santos
Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira
Luísa Brito
author_facet Acácio Salamandane
Jussara Correia
Belo Afonso Muetanene
Madalena dos Santos
Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira
Luísa Brito
author_sort Acácio Salamandane
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the biofilm-forming ability and the resistance of planktonic cells and biofilm to methicillin (MIC and MBC, and log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> reduction, respectively). Thirty-four isolates were used, including coagulase-positive <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CPS) and coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CNS), recovered from ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. Biofilm-forming ability was based on enumeration of viable cells from biofilms formed on three types of surfaces, namely stainless steel, polystyrene, and glass. Thirteen of the thirty-four isolates (38.2%) were methicillin-resistant (MIC higher than 4 µg/mL). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (CPS) and <i>Staphylococcus saprophyticus</i> (CNS) were the species that showed the highest percentage of resistance (50% and 71.4%, respectively). <i>Staphylococcus warneri</i> was the only species susceptible to methicillin. In 20 of the 34 isolates, the MBC value was twice the MIC value. The CPS (<i>S. aureus</i>) and the CNS (the other species) were not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on biofilm-forming ability on the three surfaces used. However, when comparing the averages obtained for the biofilm-forming ability of the isolates, the values obtained (log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) in polystyrene were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than those obtained with the isolates on stainless steel. On the other hand, data from biofilm-forming ability of the isolates on glass and stainless steel are positively and significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.54; <i>p</i> = 0.02). It was not possible to determine the concentration of methicillin that promotes biofilm removal since log reductions were less than 3 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. The results of this study indicate that foodborne CPS and CNS can form biofilms on different types of material. As these biofilms are resistant to high concentrations of methicillin, their occurrence in food environments and their spread to medical settings can result in staphylococcal food poisoning or, in the worst-case scenario, septicemia, respectively. Good hygiene and good manufacturing practices (GHP and GMP) are therefore mandatory to prevent contamination with <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:47:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d3721cbc8b534a4cabcaa68242e1d757
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:47:29Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-d3721cbc8b534a4cabcaa68242e1d7572023-11-18T16:10:32ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-06-011313772510.3390/app13137725Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming StaphylococciAcácio Salamandane0Jussara Correia1Belo Afonso Muetanene2Madalena dos Santos3Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira4Luísa Brito5LEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Center, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, PortugalLEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Center, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, PortugalFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Lúrio, Campus Universitário de Unango, Sanga 3300, MozambiqueLEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Center, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, PortugalLEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Center, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, PortugalLEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Center, Associate Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, PortugalThe aim of this study was to evaluate the biofilm-forming ability and the resistance of planktonic cells and biofilm to methicillin (MIC and MBC, and log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> reduction, respectively). Thirty-four isolates were used, including coagulase-positive <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CPS) and coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i> (CNS), recovered from ready-to-eat (RTE) foods. Biofilm-forming ability was based on enumeration of viable cells from biofilms formed on three types of surfaces, namely stainless steel, polystyrene, and glass. Thirteen of the thirty-four isolates (38.2%) were methicillin-resistant (MIC higher than 4 µg/mL). <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (CPS) and <i>Staphylococcus saprophyticus</i> (CNS) were the species that showed the highest percentage of resistance (50% and 71.4%, respectively). <i>Staphylococcus warneri</i> was the only species susceptible to methicillin. In 20 of the 34 isolates, the MBC value was twice the MIC value. The CPS (<i>S. aureus</i>) and the CNS (the other species) were not significantly different (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on biofilm-forming ability on the three surfaces used. However, when comparing the averages obtained for the biofilm-forming ability of the isolates, the values obtained (log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) in polystyrene were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than those obtained with the isolates on stainless steel. On the other hand, data from biofilm-forming ability of the isolates on glass and stainless steel are positively and significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.54; <i>p</i> = 0.02). It was not possible to determine the concentration of methicillin that promotes biofilm removal since log reductions were less than 3 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>. The results of this study indicate that foodborne CPS and CNS can form biofilms on different types of material. As these biofilms are resistant to high concentrations of methicillin, their occurrence in food environments and their spread to medical settings can result in staphylococcal food poisoning or, in the worst-case scenario, septicemia, respectively. Good hygiene and good manufacturing practices (GHP and GMP) are therefore mandatory to prevent contamination with <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/13/7725foodborne <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.biofilmsmethicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA)minimum inhibitory concentration—MICminimum bactericidal concentration—MBC
spellingShingle Acácio Salamandane
Jussara Correia
Belo Afonso Muetanene
Madalena dos Santos
Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira
Luísa Brito
Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
Applied Sciences
foodborne <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.
biofilms
methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA)
minimum inhibitory concentration—MIC
minimum bactericidal concentration—MBC
title Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
title_full Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
title_fullStr Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
title_full_unstemmed Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
title_short Methicillin Resistance of Food-Borne Biofilm-Forming Staphylococci
title_sort methicillin resistance of food borne biofilm forming staphylococci
topic foodborne <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp.
biofilms
methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA)
minimum inhibitory concentration—MIC
minimum bactericidal concentration—MBC
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/13/7725
work_keys_str_mv AT acaciosalamandane methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci
AT jussaracorreia methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci
AT beloafonsomuetanene methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci
AT madalenadossantos methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci
AT manuelmalfeitoferreira methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci
AT luisabrito methicillinresistanceoffoodbornebiofilmformingstaphylococci