Maximum number of repetitions performed by resistance-trained men: Effect of maximum load intensity and exercise selection

The purpose of this study was to compare the number of maximum repetitions (RMs) performed at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and 80% of one-repetition maximum eccentric (1RMecc) test for the preacher-curl (PC) and the bench-press (BP) exercises. Fifteen resistance-trained men participated in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles R. Lopes, Alex H. Crisp, Rozangela Verlengia, Cesar A. Macarrone, Dyego A. Peghim, Gustavo R. Mota, Marcelo S. Aoki, Paulo H. Marchetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) 2014-06-01
Series:Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742014000200221&lng=en&tlng=en
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare the number of maximum repetitions (RMs) performed at 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and 80% of one-repetition maximum eccentric (1RMecc) test for the preacher-curl (PC) and the bench-press (BP) exercises. Fifteen resistance-trained men participated in this counterbalanced-crossover study. There was no significant difference in the number of RMs performed at 80%-1RM (PC: 7.0±1.2 RMs and BP: 5.8±1.3 RMs) and 80%-1RMecc (PC: 6.0±1.1 RMs and BP: 5.4±1.1 RMs) for both exercises. No significant difference in the numbers of RMs was detected between the PC (80%-1RM: 7.0±1.2 RMs and 80%-1RMecc: 6.0±1.1 RMs) and BP exercises (80%-1RM: 5.8±1.3 RMs and 80%-1RMecc: 5.4±1.1 RMs) for both intensities. In conclusion, the number of RMs performed by resistance-trained men was not affected by the maximum load intensity based on muscle action and the exercise selection.
ISSN:1980-6574