Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination

An inventive method was applied to determine the minimum major radius, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>, and the optimum build of a tokamak fusion reactor that simultaneously meets all physics, engineering, and neutronics constraints. With a simple cost model, tokamak systems analyses we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gahyung Jo, Jae-Min Kwon, Ara Cho, Hyun-Kyung Chung, Bong-Guen Hong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6817
_version_ 1797514687006375936
author Gahyung Jo
Jae-Min Kwon
Ara Cho
Hyun-Kyung Chung
Bong-Guen Hong
author_facet Gahyung Jo
Jae-Min Kwon
Ara Cho
Hyun-Kyung Chung
Bong-Guen Hong
author_sort Gahyung Jo
collection DOAJ
description An inventive method was applied to determine the minimum major radius, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>, and the optimum build of a tokamak fusion reactor that simultaneously meets all physics, engineering, and neutronics constraints. With a simple cost model, tokamak systems analyses were carried out over ranges of system parameters to find an optimum build of a tokamak fusion reactor at minimum cost. The impact of a wide range of physics parameters and advanced engineering elements on costs were also addressed. When a central solenoid was used to ramp up a plasma current, design solutions with a cost of electricity (COE) between 109 and 140 mills/kWh, direct capital cost between 5000 and 6000 M/USD, and net electric power, <i>P<sub>e</sub></i> between 1000 and 1600 MW could be found with a minimum <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> between 6.0 and 7.0 m, and fusion power, <i>P<sub>fusion</sub></i> between 2000 and 2800 MW. When the plasma current was driven by a non-inductive external system, the system size and costs could be reduced further; a COE between 98 and 130 mills/kWh, direct capital cost between 4000 and 5000 M$, and <i>P<sub>e</sub></i> between 1000 and 1420 MW could be found with a minimum <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> between 5.1 and 6.7 m, and <i>P<sub>fusion</sub></i> between 2000 and 2650 MW.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:35:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d9688bdbb66f49208c66f5522bb76488
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:35:07Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-d9688bdbb66f49208c66f5522bb764882023-11-22T18:09:16ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-10-011420681710.3390/en14206817Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build DeterminationGahyung Jo0Jae-Min Kwon1Ara Cho2Hyun-Kyung Chung3Bong-Guen Hong4Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon 34133, KoreaKorea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon 34133, KoreaKorea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon 34133, KoreaKorea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon 34133, KoreaQuantum System Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, KoreaAn inventive method was applied to determine the minimum major radius, <i>R</i><sub>0</sub>, and the optimum build of a tokamak fusion reactor that simultaneously meets all physics, engineering, and neutronics constraints. With a simple cost model, tokamak systems analyses were carried out over ranges of system parameters to find an optimum build of a tokamak fusion reactor at minimum cost. The impact of a wide range of physics parameters and advanced engineering elements on costs were also addressed. When a central solenoid was used to ramp up a plasma current, design solutions with a cost of electricity (COE) between 109 and 140 mills/kWh, direct capital cost between 5000 and 6000 M/USD, and net electric power, <i>P<sub>e</sub></i> between 1000 and 1600 MW could be found with a minimum <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> between 6.0 and 7.0 m, and fusion power, <i>P<sub>fusion</sub></i> between 2000 and 2800 MW. When the plasma current was driven by a non-inductive external system, the system size and costs could be reduced further; a COE between 98 and 130 mills/kWh, direct capital cost between 4000 and 5000 M$, and <i>P<sub>e</sub></i> between 1000 and 1420 MW could be found with a minimum <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> between 5.1 and 6.7 m, and <i>P<sub>fusion</sub></i> between 2000 and 2650 MW.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6817coupled systems analysiscost assessmenttokamak fusion reactor
spellingShingle Gahyung Jo
Jae-Min Kwon
Ara Cho
Hyun-Kyung Chung
Bong-Guen Hong
Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
Energies
coupled systems analysis
cost assessment
tokamak fusion reactor
title Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
title_full Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
title_fullStr Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
title_full_unstemmed Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
title_short Cost Assessment of a Tokamak Fusion Reactor with an Inventive Method for Optimum Build Determination
title_sort cost assessment of a tokamak fusion reactor with an inventive method for optimum build determination
topic coupled systems analysis
cost assessment
tokamak fusion reactor
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6817
work_keys_str_mv AT gahyungjo costassessmentofatokamakfusionreactorwithaninventivemethodforoptimumbuilddetermination
AT jaeminkwon costassessmentofatokamakfusionreactorwithaninventivemethodforoptimumbuilddetermination
AT aracho costassessmentofatokamakfusionreactorwithaninventivemethodforoptimumbuilddetermination
AT hyunkyungchung costassessmentofatokamakfusionreactorwithaninventivemethodforoptimumbuilddetermination
AT bongguenhong costassessmentofatokamakfusionreactorwithaninventivemethodforoptimumbuilddetermination