Comparison of two commercial broad-range PCR and sequencing assays for identification of bacteria in culture-negative clinical samples
Abstract Background Culturing has long been the gold standard for detecting aetiologic agents in bacterial infections. In some cases, however, culturing fails to detect the infection. To further investigate culture-negative samples, amplification and subsequent sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is oft...
Main Authors: | Camilla Stavnsbjerg, Niels Frimodt-Møller, Claus Moser, Thomas Bjarnsholt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-017-2333-9 |
Similar Items
-
Limited diagnostic possibilities for bloodstream infections with broad‐range methods: A promising PCR/electrospray ionization‐mass spectrometry platform is no longer available
by: Jan Tkadlec, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
IDENTIFICATION OF GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA OF FISH BY THE METHOD OF PCR-RFLP OF 16S rDNA GENE
by: Yu. Rud
Published: (2013-03-01) -
Microbiological Study for Comparison between Broad Range 16S rDNA PCR and Conventional Blood Culture for Diagnosis of Sepsis in The Newborn
by: Mohamed Nabil, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Value of Broad Range 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene PCR / Sequencing (Br-PCR) of CSF in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis
by: Ashley Rogers, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Application of fluorescence based molecular assays for improved detection and typing of Brucella strains in clinical samples
by: Kiril Krstevski, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)