Testing for the Unconfoundedness Assumption Using an Instrumental Assumption
The identification of average causal effects of a treatment in observational studies is typically based either on the unconfoundedness assumption (exogeneity of the treatment) or on the availability of an instrument. When available, instruments may also be used to test for the unconfoundedness assum...
主要な著者: | de Luna Xavier, Johansson Per |
---|---|
フォーマット: | 論文 |
言語: | English |
出版事項: |
De Gruyter
2014-09-01
|
シリーズ: | Journal of Causal Inference |
主題: | |
オンライン・アクセス: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0011 |
類似資料
-
Latent class instrumental variables and the monotonicity assumption
著者:: Stuart G. Baker
出版事項: (2020-03-01) -
Estimating Stochastic Volatility under the Assumption of Stochastic Volatility of Volatility
著者:: Moawia Alghalith, 等
出版事項: (2020-04-01) -
An Upper Bound of the Bias of Nadaraya-Watson Kernel Regression under Lipschitz Assumptions
著者:: Samuele Tosatto, 等
出版事項: (2020-12-01) -
Assumption Trade-Offs When Choosing Identification Strategies for Pre-Post Treatment Effect Estimation: An Illustration of a Community-Based Intervention in Madagascar
著者:: Weber Ann M., 等
出版事項: (2015-03-01) -
An improved multiply robust estimator for the average treatment effect
著者:: Ce Wang, 等
出版事項: (2023-10-01)