Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design
This article uses assessment validation as a framework to construct a theory of how to assess a PhD in design. This also has implications for what the PhD degree should be in design. When examiners assess a PhD student’s dissertation or defense, interpretation arguments and use arguments connect the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-01-01
|
Series: | She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000030 |
_version_ | 1827310685680304128 |
---|---|
author | Luke Feast |
author_facet | Luke Feast |
author_sort | Luke Feast |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This article uses assessment validation as a framework to construct a theory of how to assess a PhD in design. This also has implications for what the PhD degree should be in design. When examiners assess a PhD student’s dissertation or defense, interpretation arguments and use arguments connect the assessment to the ultimate purpose and consequence of the PhD project they assess. My conclusion is that this argument-based approach strengthens the credibility, meaningfulness, and fairness of PhD assessment. The perspective of assessment validation enhances the PhD in design by focusing validation on inferences and assumptions that connect scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and the implications of PhD assessment. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T20:04:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e04d01299f224648b97bc57b55a0626d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2405-8726 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T20:04:02Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation |
spelling | doaj.art-e04d01299f224648b97bc57b55a0626d2024-03-24T06:59:50ZengElsevierShe Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation2405-87262023-01-0194518540Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in DesignLuke Feast0Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, DenmarkThis article uses assessment validation as a framework to construct a theory of how to assess a PhD in design. This also has implications for what the PhD degree should be in design. When examiners assess a PhD student’s dissertation or defense, interpretation arguments and use arguments connect the assessment to the ultimate purpose and consequence of the PhD project they assess. My conclusion is that this argument-based approach strengthens the credibility, meaningfulness, and fairness of PhD assessment. The perspective of assessment validation enhances the PhD in design by focusing validation on inferences and assumptions that connect scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and the implications of PhD assessment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000030Doctoral educationDoctor of philosophyAssessmentDesignLiterature review |
spellingShingle | Luke Feast Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation Doctoral education Doctor of philosophy Assessment Design Literature review |
title | Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design |
title_full | Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design |
title_fullStr | Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design |
title_short | Bridging Reasoning and Results: An Assessment Validation Perspective on the PhD in Design |
title_sort | bridging reasoning and results an assessment validation perspective on the phd in design |
topic | Doctoral education Doctor of philosophy Assessment Design Literature review |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukefeast bridgingreasoningandresultsanassessmentvalidationperspectiveonthephdindesign |