Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer

Cancer-bearing mice are at risk of developing anxiety, pain, or malaise. These conditions may not only harm welfare but could also undermine data quality and translational validity in studies to develop therapeutic interventions. We aimed to establish whether, or at what point mice developing lung c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy L. Miller, Johnny V. Roughan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/1/23
_version_ 1827668875672551424
author Amy L. Miller
Johnny V. Roughan
author_facet Amy L. Miller
Johnny V. Roughan
author_sort Amy L. Miller
collection DOAJ
description Cancer-bearing mice are at risk of developing anxiety, pain, or malaise. These conditions may not only harm welfare but could also undermine data quality and translational validity in studies to develop therapeutic interventions. We aimed to establish whether, or at what point mice developing lung cancer show these symptoms, what measures can best detect their onset, and if data quality and animal welfare can be enhanced by using non-aversive handling (NAH). Welfare was monitored using various daily methods. At the beginning and end of the study, we also scored behaviour for general welfare evaluation, recorded nociceptive thresholds, and applied the mouse grimace scale (MGS). Cancer caused a decline in daily welfare parameters (body weight, and food and water consumption) beginning at around 4 days prior to euthanasia. As cancer progressed, rearing and walking declined to a greater extent in cancer-bearing versus control mice, while grooming, inactive periods, and MGS scores increased. A decline in nest building capability and food consumption provided a particularly effective means of detecting deteriorating welfare. These changes suggested a welfare problem arose as cancer developed, so similar studies would benefit from refinement, with mice being removed from the study at least 4 days earlier. However, the problem of highly varied tumour growth made it difficult to determine this time-point accurately. There were no detectable beneficial effects of NAH on either data quality or in terms of enhanced welfare.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e0ae8dfbe93f46df9e89501d76f976e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:51:42Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-e0ae8dfbe93f46df9e89501d76f976e72023-11-23T11:04:35ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-12-011212310.3390/ani12010023Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung CancerAmy L. Miller0Johnny V. Roughan1School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UKInstitute of Bioscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UKCancer-bearing mice are at risk of developing anxiety, pain, or malaise. These conditions may not only harm welfare but could also undermine data quality and translational validity in studies to develop therapeutic interventions. We aimed to establish whether, or at what point mice developing lung cancer show these symptoms, what measures can best detect their onset, and if data quality and animal welfare can be enhanced by using non-aversive handling (NAH). Welfare was monitored using various daily methods. At the beginning and end of the study, we also scored behaviour for general welfare evaluation, recorded nociceptive thresholds, and applied the mouse grimace scale (MGS). Cancer caused a decline in daily welfare parameters (body weight, and food and water consumption) beginning at around 4 days prior to euthanasia. As cancer progressed, rearing and walking declined to a greater extent in cancer-bearing versus control mice, while grooming, inactive periods, and MGS scores increased. A decline in nest building capability and food consumption provided a particularly effective means of detecting deteriorating welfare. These changes suggested a welfare problem arose as cancer developed, so similar studies would benefit from refinement, with mice being removed from the study at least 4 days earlier. However, the problem of highly varied tumour growth made it difficult to determine this time-point accurately. There were no detectable beneficial effects of NAH on either data quality or in terms of enhanced welfare.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/1/23mouse welfarelung cancerpainnest buildingIVISbehaviour
spellingShingle Amy L. Miller
Johnny V. Roughan
Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
Animals
mouse welfare
lung cancer
pain
nest building
IVIS
behaviour
title Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
title_full Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
title_short Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer
title_sort welfare assessment end point refinement and the effects of non aversive handling in c57bl 6 mice with lewis lung cancer
topic mouse welfare
lung cancer
pain
nest building
IVIS
behaviour
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/1/23
work_keys_str_mv AT amylmiller welfareassessmentendpointrefinementandtheeffectsofnonaversivehandlinginc57bl6micewithlewislungcancer
AT johnnyvroughan welfareassessmentendpointrefinementandtheeffectsofnonaversivehandlinginc57bl6micewithlewislungcancer