Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations

Including students with special educational needs in learning (SEN-L) is a challenge for large-scale assessments. In order to draw inferences with respect to students with SEN-L and to compare their scores to students in general education, one needs to assure that the measurement model is reliable a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Südkamp, Steffi Pohl, Sabine Weinert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EARLI 2015-06-01
Series:Frontline Learning Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/130
_version_ 1818014802653478912
author Anna Südkamp
Steffi Pohl
Sabine Weinert
author_facet Anna Südkamp
Steffi Pohl
Sabine Weinert
author_sort Anna Südkamp
collection DOAJ
description Including students with special educational needs in learning (SEN-L) is a challenge for large-scale assessments. In order to draw inferences with respect to students with SEN-L and to compare their scores to students in general education, one needs to assure that the measurement model is reliable and that the same construct is measured for different samples and test forms. In this article, we focus on testing the appropriateness of competence assessments for students with SEN-L. We specifically asked how the reading competence of students with SEN-L may be assessed reliably and comparably. We thoroughly evaluated different testing accommodations for students with SEN-L. The reading competence of N = 433 students with SEN-L was assessed using a standard reading test, a reduced test version, and an easy test version. Also, N = 5,208 general education students and a group of N = 490 low-performing students were tested. Results show that all three reading test versions are suitable for a reliable and comparable measurement of reading competence in students without SEN-L. For students with SEN-L, the accommodated test versions considerably reduced the amount of missing values and resulted in better psychometric properties than the standard test. They did not, however, show satisfactory item fit and measurement invariance. Implications for future research are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T06:48:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e20434e95a25478b8f7b7025d79e3b0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2295-3159
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T06:48:58Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher EARLI
record_format Article
series Frontline Learning Research
spelling doaj.art-e20434e95a25478b8f7b7025d79e3b0a2022-12-22T02:07:05ZengEARLIFrontline Learning Research2295-31592015-06-013210.14786/flr.v3i2.130Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing AccommodationsAnna Südkamp0Steffi Pohl1Sabine Weinert2TU Dortmund UniversityFreie Universität BerlinUniversity of BambergIncluding students with special educational needs in learning (SEN-L) is a challenge for large-scale assessments. In order to draw inferences with respect to students with SEN-L and to compare their scores to students in general education, one needs to assure that the measurement model is reliable and that the same construct is measured for different samples and test forms. In this article, we focus on testing the appropriateness of competence assessments for students with SEN-L. We specifically asked how the reading competence of students with SEN-L may be assessed reliably and comparably. We thoroughly evaluated different testing accommodations for students with SEN-L. The reading competence of N = 433 students with SEN-L was assessed using a standard reading test, a reduced test version, and an easy test version. Also, N = 5,208 general education students and a group of N = 490 low-performing students were tested. Results show that all three reading test versions are suitable for a reliable and comparable measurement of reading competence in students without SEN-L. For students with SEN-L, the accommodated test versions considerably reduced the amount of missing values and resulted in better psychometric properties than the standard test. They did not, however, show satisfactory item fit and measurement invariance. Implications for future research are discussed. https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/130students with special educational needstesting accommodationsreading competencelarge-scale assessment
spellingShingle Anna Südkamp
Steffi Pohl
Sabine Weinert
Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
Frontline Learning Research
students with special educational needs
testing accommodations
reading competence
large-scale assessment
title Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
title_full Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
title_fullStr Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
title_full_unstemmed Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
title_short Competence Assessment of Students With Special Educational Needs—Identification of Appropriate Testing Accommodations
title_sort competence assessment of students with special educational needs identification of appropriate testing accommodations
topic students with special educational needs
testing accommodations
reading competence
large-scale assessment
url https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/130
work_keys_str_mv AT annasudkamp competenceassessmentofstudentswithspecialeducationalneedsidentificationofappropriatetestingaccommodations
AT steffipohl competenceassessmentofstudentswithspecialeducationalneedsidentificationofappropriatetestingaccommodations
AT sabineweinert competenceassessmentofstudentswithspecialeducationalneedsidentificationofappropriatetestingaccommodations