Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food

Abstract EFSA was asked for a scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs) in food. The risk assessment was confined to those 10 carcinogenic N‐NAs occurring in food (TCNAs), i.e. NDMA, NMEA, NDEA, NDPA, NDBA, NMA, NSAR, NMOR, NPIP and NPYR. N‐NA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel), Dieter Schrenk, Margherita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Jesús delMazo, Christer Hogstrand, Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom, Jean‐Charles Leblanc, Carlo Stefano Nebbia, Elsa Nielsen, Evangelia Ntzani, Annette Petersen, Salomon Sand, Tanja Schwerdtle, Christiane Vleminckx, Heather Wallace, Benigni Romualdo, Cristina Fortes, Stephen Hecht, Marco Iammarino, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Francesca Riolo, Anna Christodoulidou, Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884
_version_ 1827950417631248384
author EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel)
Dieter Schrenk
Margherita Bignami
Laurent Bodin
James Kevin Chipman
Jesús delMazo
Christer Hogstrand
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Elsa Nielsen
Evangelia Ntzani
Annette Petersen
Salomon Sand
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Heather Wallace
Benigni Romualdo
Cristina Fortes
Stephen Hecht
Marco Iammarino
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Francesca Riolo
Anna Christodoulidou
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
author_facet EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel)
Dieter Schrenk
Margherita Bignami
Laurent Bodin
James Kevin Chipman
Jesús delMazo
Christer Hogstrand
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Elsa Nielsen
Evangelia Ntzani
Annette Petersen
Salomon Sand
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Heather Wallace
Benigni Romualdo
Cristina Fortes
Stephen Hecht
Marco Iammarino
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Francesca Riolo
Anna Christodoulidou
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
author_sort EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract EFSA was asked for a scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs) in food. The risk assessment was confined to those 10 carcinogenic N‐NAs occurring in food (TCNAs), i.e. NDMA, NMEA, NDEA, NDPA, NDBA, NMA, NSAR, NMOR, NPIP and NPYR. N‐NAs are genotoxic and induce liver tumours in rodents. The in vivo data available to derive potency factors are limited, and therefore, equal potency of TCNAs was assumed. The lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose at 10% (BMDL10) was 10 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day, derived from the incidence of rat liver tumours (benign and malignant) induced by NDEA and used in a margin of exposure (MOE) approach. Analytical results on the occurrence of N‐NAs were extracted from the EFSA occurrence database (n = 2,817) and the literature (n = 4,003). Occurrence data were available for five food categories across TCNAs. Dietary exposure was assessed for two scenarios, excluding (scenario 1) and including (scenario 2) cooked unprocessed meat and fish. TCNAs exposure ranged from 0 to 208.9 ng/kg bw per day across surveys, age groups and scenarios. ‘Meat and meat products’ is the main food category contributing to TCNA exposure. MOEs ranged from 3,337 to 48 at the P95 exposure excluding some infant surveys with P95 exposure equal to zero. Two major uncertainties were (i) the high number of left censored data and (ii) the lack of data on important food categories. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the MOE for TCNAs at the P95 exposure is highly likely (98–100% certain) to be less than 10,000 for all age groups, which raises a health concern.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T13:25:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e273443793d34434ab060cb79c4ee6a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T13:25:50Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-e273443793d34434ab060cb79c4ee6a62023-05-10T11:11:19ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322023-03-01213n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in foodEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel)Dieter SchrenkMargherita BignamiLaurent BodinJames Kevin ChipmanJesús delMazoChrister HogstrandLaurentius (Ron) HoogenboomJean‐Charles LeblancCarlo Stefano NebbiaElsa NielsenEvangelia NtzaniAnnette PetersenSalomon SandTanja SchwerdtleChristiane VleminckxHeather WallaceBenigni RomualdoCristina FortesStephen HechtMarco IammarinoOlaf Mosbach‐SchulzFrancesca RioloAnna ChristodoulidouBettina Grasl‐KrauppAbstract EFSA was asked for a scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs) in food. The risk assessment was confined to those 10 carcinogenic N‐NAs occurring in food (TCNAs), i.e. NDMA, NMEA, NDEA, NDPA, NDBA, NMA, NSAR, NMOR, NPIP and NPYR. N‐NAs are genotoxic and induce liver tumours in rodents. The in vivo data available to derive potency factors are limited, and therefore, equal potency of TCNAs was assumed. The lower confidence limit of the benchmark dose at 10% (BMDL10) was 10 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day, derived from the incidence of rat liver tumours (benign and malignant) induced by NDEA and used in a margin of exposure (MOE) approach. Analytical results on the occurrence of N‐NAs were extracted from the EFSA occurrence database (n = 2,817) and the literature (n = 4,003). Occurrence data were available for five food categories across TCNAs. Dietary exposure was assessed for two scenarios, excluding (scenario 1) and including (scenario 2) cooked unprocessed meat and fish. TCNAs exposure ranged from 0 to 208.9 ng/kg bw per day across surveys, age groups and scenarios. ‘Meat and meat products’ is the main food category contributing to TCNA exposure. MOEs ranged from 3,337 to 48 at the P95 exposure excluding some infant surveys with P95 exposure equal to zero. Two major uncertainties were (i) the high number of left censored data and (ii) the lack of data on important food categories. The CONTAM Panel concluded that the MOE for TCNAs at the P95 exposure is highly likely (98–100% certain) to be less than 10,000 for all age groups, which raises a health concern.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs)cancergenotoxicityoccurrenceexposurefood
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel)
Dieter Schrenk
Margherita Bignami
Laurent Bodin
James Kevin Chipman
Jesús delMazo
Christer Hogstrand
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Jean‐Charles Leblanc
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Elsa Nielsen
Evangelia Ntzani
Annette Petersen
Salomon Sand
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Heather Wallace
Benigni Romualdo
Cristina Fortes
Stephen Hecht
Marco Iammarino
Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz
Francesca Riolo
Anna Christodoulidou
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
EFSA Journal
N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs)
cancer
genotoxicity
occurrence
exposure
food
title Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
title_full Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
title_fullStr Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
title_short Risk assessment of N‐nitrosamines in food
title_sort risk assessment of n nitrosamines in food
topic N‐nitrosamines (N‐NAs)
cancer
genotoxicity
occurrence
exposure
food
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7884
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapaneloncontaminantsinthefoodchainefsacontampanel riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT dieterschrenk riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT margheritabignami riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT laurentbodin riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT jameskevinchipman riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT jesusdelmazo riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT christerhogstrand riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT laurentiusronhoogenboom riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT jeancharlesleblanc riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT carlostefanonebbia riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT elsanielsen riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT evangeliantzani riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT annettepetersen riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT salomonsand riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT tanjaschwerdtle riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT christianevleminckx riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT heatherwallace riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT benigniromualdo riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT cristinafortes riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT stephenhecht riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT marcoiammarino riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT olafmosbachschulz riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT francescariolo riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT annachristodoulidou riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood
AT bettinagraslkraupp riskassessmentofnnitrosaminesinfood