Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
<p class="first" id="d1573607e157"> Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While <i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial f...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UCL Press
2021-05-01
|
Series: | London Review of Education |
Online Access: | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19 |
_version_ | 1797896646522044416 |
---|---|
author | Muminah Arshad Rachel Dada Cathy Elliott Iweta Kalinowska Mehreen Khan Robert Lipiński Varun Vassanth Jotepreet Bhandal Monica de Quinto Schneider Ines Georgis Fiona Shilston |
author_facet | Muminah Arshad Rachel Dada Cathy Elliott Iweta Kalinowska Mehreen Khan Robert Lipiński Varun Vassanth Jotepreet Bhandal Monica de Quinto Schneider Ines Georgis Fiona Shilston |
author_sort | Muminah Arshad |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p class="first" id="d1573607e157">
Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently
made between diversity and decolonization. While
<i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial forms of knowledge, including practices that racialize
and categorize,
<i>diversity</i> is a policy discourse that advocates for adding different sorts of people to reading
lists and the staff and student body. As a team of staff and students, we are committed
to decolonization, but we are also aware that within our discipline of political science,
calls for diversity are more likely to be understood and accepted. We therefore bid
for, and obtained, funding to conduct a quantitative review of our department’s reading
lists in order to assess the range not only of authors, but also of topics and ideas.
We found that male White authors wrote the majority of the readings, with women of
colour authoring just 2.5 per cent of works on our curriculum. Our reading lists also
featured disappointingly little theoretical diversity, with very little coverage of
feminist, critical race or queer theory approaches, for example. We therefore used
the standard methodologies and approaches of our discipline in order to point towards
the silences and gaps that a decolonizing approach would seek to remedy. In this article,
we explain our approach and findings. The project has been educational in the best
sense and has disrupted hierarchical relationships between staff and students. It
has helped us think more deeply about how data and research inform, and sometimes
limit, change, as well as how the process of learning about how knowledge, including
reading lists, is generated can support decolonization in itself.
</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:46:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e93c933608c54b1caed653fde937147d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1474-8460 1474-8479 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T07:46:04Z |
publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
publisher | UCL Press |
record_format | Article |
series | London Review of Education |
spelling | doaj.art-e93c933608c54b1caed653fde937147d2023-02-23T10:47:39ZengUCL PressLondon Review of Education1474-84601474-84792021-05-011910.14324/LRE.19.1.19Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’Muminah ArshadRachel DadaCathy ElliottIweta KalinowskaMehreen KhanRobert LipińskiVarun VassanthJotepreet BhandalMonica de Quinto SchneiderInes GeorgisFiona Shilston<p class="first" id="d1573607e157"> Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While <i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial forms of knowledge, including practices that racialize and categorize, <i>diversity</i> is a policy discourse that advocates for adding different sorts of people to reading lists and the staff and student body. As a team of staff and students, we are committed to decolonization, but we are also aware that within our discipline of political science, calls for diversity are more likely to be understood and accepted. We therefore bid for, and obtained, funding to conduct a quantitative review of our department’s reading lists in order to assess the range not only of authors, but also of topics and ideas. We found that male White authors wrote the majority of the readings, with women of colour authoring just 2.5 per cent of works on our curriculum. Our reading lists also featured disappointingly little theoretical diversity, with very little coverage of feminist, critical race or queer theory approaches, for example. We therefore used the standard methodologies and approaches of our discipline in order to point towards the silences and gaps that a decolonizing approach would seek to remedy. In this article, we explain our approach and findings. The project has been educational in the best sense and has disrupted hierarchical relationships between staff and students. It has helped us think more deeply about how data and research inform, and sometimes limit, change, as well as how the process of learning about how knowledge, including reading lists, is generated can support decolonization in itself. </p>https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19 |
spellingShingle | Muminah Arshad Rachel Dada Cathy Elliott Iweta Kalinowska Mehreen Khan Robert Lipiński Varun Vassanth Jotepreet Bhandal Monica de Quinto Schneider Ines Georgis Fiona Shilston Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ London Review of Education |
title | Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ |
title_full | Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ |
title_fullStr | Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ |
title_short | Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’ |
title_sort | diversity or decolonization searching for the tools to dismantle the master s house |
url | https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muminaharshad diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT racheldada diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT cathyelliott diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT iwetakalinowska diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT mehreenkhan diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT robertlipinski diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT varunvassanth diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT jotepreetbhandal diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT monicadequintoschneider diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT inesgeorgis diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse AT fionashilston diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse |