Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’

<p class="first" id="d1573607e157"> Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While <i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muminah Arshad, Rachel Dada, Cathy Elliott, Iweta Kalinowska, Mehreen Khan, Robert Lipiński, Varun Vassanth, Jotepreet Bhandal, Monica de Quinto Schneider, Ines Georgis, Fiona Shilston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2021-05-01
Series:London Review of Education
Online Access:https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19
_version_ 1797896646522044416
author Muminah Arshad
Rachel Dada
Cathy Elliott
Iweta Kalinowska
Mehreen Khan
Robert Lipiński
Varun Vassanth
Jotepreet Bhandal
Monica de Quinto Schneider
Ines Georgis
Fiona Shilston
author_facet Muminah Arshad
Rachel Dada
Cathy Elliott
Iweta Kalinowska
Mehreen Khan
Robert Lipiński
Varun Vassanth
Jotepreet Bhandal
Monica de Quinto Schneider
Ines Georgis
Fiona Shilston
author_sort Muminah Arshad
collection DOAJ
description <p class="first" id="d1573607e157"> Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While <i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial forms of knowledge, including practices that racialize and categorize, <i>diversity</i> is a policy discourse that advocates for adding different sorts of people to reading lists and the staff and student body. As a team of staff and students, we are committed to decolonization, but we are also aware that within our discipline of political science, calls for diversity are more likely to be understood and accepted. We therefore bid for, and obtained, funding to conduct a quantitative review of our department’s reading lists in order to assess the range not only of authors, but also of topics and ideas. We found that male White authors wrote the majority of the readings, with women of colour authoring just 2.5 per cent of works on our curriculum. Our reading lists also featured disappointingly little theoretical diversity, with very little coverage of feminist, critical race or queer theory approaches, for example. We therefore used the standard methodologies and approaches of our discipline in order to point towards the silences and gaps that a decolonizing approach would seek to remedy. In this article, we explain our approach and findings. The project has been educational in the best sense and has disrupted hierarchical relationships between staff and students. It has helped us think more deeply about how data and research inform, and sometimes limit, change, as well as how the process of learning about how knowledge, including reading lists, is generated can support decolonization in itself. </p>
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:46:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e93c933608c54b1caed653fde937147d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1474-8460
1474-8479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:46:04Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher UCL Press
record_format Article
series London Review of Education
spelling doaj.art-e93c933608c54b1caed653fde937147d2023-02-23T10:47:39ZengUCL PressLondon Review of Education1474-84601474-84792021-05-011910.14324/LRE.19.1.19Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’Muminah ArshadRachel DadaCathy ElliottIweta KalinowskaMehreen KhanRobert LipińskiVarun VassanthJotepreet BhandalMonica de Quinto SchneiderInes GeorgisFiona Shilston<p class="first" id="d1573607e157"> Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While <i>decolonization</i> entails dismantling colonial forms of knowledge, including practices that racialize and categorize, <i>diversity</i> is a policy discourse that advocates for adding different sorts of people to reading lists and the staff and student body. As a team of staff and students, we are committed to decolonization, but we are also aware that within our discipline of political science, calls for diversity are more likely to be understood and accepted. We therefore bid for, and obtained, funding to conduct a quantitative review of our department’s reading lists in order to assess the range not only of authors, but also of topics and ideas. We found that male White authors wrote the majority of the readings, with women of colour authoring just 2.5 per cent of works on our curriculum. Our reading lists also featured disappointingly little theoretical diversity, with very little coverage of feminist, critical race or queer theory approaches, for example. We therefore used the standard methodologies and approaches of our discipline in order to point towards the silences and gaps that a decolonizing approach would seek to remedy. In this article, we explain our approach and findings. The project has been educational in the best sense and has disrupted hierarchical relationships between staff and students. It has helped us think more deeply about how data and research inform, and sometimes limit, change, as well as how the process of learning about how knowledge, including reading lists, is generated can support decolonization in itself. </p>https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19
spellingShingle Muminah Arshad
Rachel Dada
Cathy Elliott
Iweta Kalinowska
Mehreen Khan
Robert Lipiński
Varun Vassanth
Jotepreet Bhandal
Monica de Quinto Schneider
Ines Georgis
Fiona Shilston
Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
London Review of Education
title Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
title_full Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
title_fullStr Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
title_full_unstemmed Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
title_short Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’
title_sort diversity or decolonization searching for the tools to dismantle the master s house
url https://uclpress.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/LRE.19.1.19
work_keys_str_mv AT muminaharshad diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT racheldada diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT cathyelliott diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT iwetakalinowska diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT mehreenkhan diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT robertlipinski diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT varunvassanth diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT jotepreetbhandal diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT monicadequintoschneider diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT inesgeorgis diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse
AT fionashilston diversityordecolonizationsearchingforthetoolstodismantlethemastershouse