Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study

The statement below equation 3.16 about possible multiple embeddings of the N=2 superconformal algebra in N=4 is wrong. The embedding (used later in the paper) is unique. The decomposition of the symmetric product representation is wrong. Below equation 4.8, one should read ∆ = 1 instead of 2, and ∆...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Constantin Bachas, Massimo Bianchi, Amihay Hanany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)032