Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study
The statement below equation 3.16 about possible multiple embeddings of the N=2 superconformal algebra in N=4 is wrong. The embedding (used later in the paper) is unique. The decomposition of the symmetric product representation is wrong. Below equation 4.8, one should read ∆ = 1 instead of 2, and ∆...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
| Series: | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)032 |
| _version_ | 1811274187152556032 |
|---|---|
| author | Constantin Bachas Massimo Bianchi Amihay Hanany |
| author_facet | Constantin Bachas Massimo Bianchi Amihay Hanany |
| author_sort | Constantin Bachas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The statement below equation 3.16 about possible multiple embeddings of the N=2 superconformal algebra in N=4 is wrong. The embedding (used later in the paper) is unique. The decomposition of the symmetric product representation is wrong. Below equation 4.8, one should read ∆ = 1 instead of 2, and ∆ = 2 instead of 4. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:14:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e9a26ce9141141bfb93fa1d9ed4fb0dc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1029-8479 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T23:14:23Z |
| publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| spelling | doaj.art-e9a26ce9141141bfb93fa1d9ed4fb0dc2022-12-22T03:12:44ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792018-10-012018101110.1007/JHEP10(2018)032Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print studyConstantin Bachas0Massimo Bianchi1Amihay Hanany2Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de l’ École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”Theoretical Physics Group, Imperial College LondonThe statement below equation 3.16 about possible multiple embeddings of the N=2 superconformal algebra in N=4 is wrong. The embedding (used later in the paper) is unique. The decomposition of the symmetric product representation is wrong. Below equation 4.8, one should read ∆ = 1 instead of 2, and ∆ = 2 instead of 4.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)032 |
| spellingShingle | Constantin Bachas Massimo Bianchi Amihay Hanany Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study Journal of High Energy Physics |
| title | Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study |
| title_full | Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study |
| title_fullStr | Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study |
| title_short | Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study |
| title_sort | erratum to n 2 mathcal n 2 moduli of ads4 vacua a fine print study |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)032 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT constantinbachas erratumton2mathcaln2moduliofads4vacuaafineprintstudy AT massimobianchi erratumton2mathcaln2moduliofads4vacuaafineprintstudy AT amihayhanany erratumton2mathcaln2moduliofads4vacuaafineprintstudy |