Erratum to: N = 2 $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ moduli of AdS4 vacua: a fine-print study
The statement below equation 3.16 about possible multiple embeddings of the N=2 superconformal algebra in N=4 is wrong. The embedding (used later in the paper) is unique. The decomposition of the symmetric product representation is wrong. Below equation 4.8, one should read ∆ = 1 instead of 2, and ∆...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of High Energy Physics |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)032 |