Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) uniquely require binding of two different neurotransmitter agonists for synaptic transmission. D-serine and glycine bind to one subunit, GluN1, while glutamate binds to the other, GluN2. These agonists bind to the receptor’s bi-lobed ligand-binding domains (LB...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Remy A Yovanno, Tsung Han Chou, Sarah J Brantley, Hiro Furukawa, Albert Y Lau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2022-10-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/77645
_version_ 1797989935113830400
author Remy A Yovanno
Tsung Han Chou
Sarah J Brantley
Hiro Furukawa
Albert Y Lau
author_facet Remy A Yovanno
Tsung Han Chou
Sarah J Brantley
Hiro Furukawa
Albert Y Lau
author_sort Remy A Yovanno
collection DOAJ
description N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) uniquely require binding of two different neurotransmitter agonists for synaptic transmission. D-serine and glycine bind to one subunit, GluN1, while glutamate binds to the other, GluN2. These agonists bind to the receptor’s bi-lobed ligand-binding domains (LBDs), which close around the agonist during receptor activation. To better understand the unexplored mechanisms by which D-serine contributes to receptor activation, we performed multi-microsecond molecular dynamics simulations of the GluN1/GluN2A LBD dimer with free D-serine and glutamate agonists. Surprisingly, we observed D-serine binding to both GluN1 and GluN2A LBDs, suggesting that D-serine competes with glutamate for binding to GluN2A. This mechanism is confirmed by our electrophysiology experiments, which show that D-serine is indeed inhibitory at high concentrations. Although free energy calculations indicate that D-serine stabilizes the closed GluN2A LBD, its inhibitory behavior suggests that it either does not remain bound long enough or does not generate sufficient force for ion channel gating. We developed a workflow using pathway similarity analysis to identify groups of residues working together to promote binding. These conformation-dependent pathways were not significantly impacted by the presence of N-linked glycans, which act primarily by interacting with the LBD bottom lobe to stabilize the closed LBD.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:28:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb5619844bf3461594e8352d599b58d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:28:26Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-eb5619844bf3461594e8352d599b58d62022-12-22T04:34:40ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2022-10-011110.7554/eLife.77645Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptorRemy A Yovanno0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3852-6684Tsung Han Chou1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-6283Sarah J Brantley2Hiro Furukawa3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-8426Albert Y Lau4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-7558Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United StatesW.M. Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United StatesW.M. Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United StatesDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United StatesN-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) uniquely require binding of two different neurotransmitter agonists for synaptic transmission. D-serine and glycine bind to one subunit, GluN1, while glutamate binds to the other, GluN2. These agonists bind to the receptor’s bi-lobed ligand-binding domains (LBDs), which close around the agonist during receptor activation. To better understand the unexplored mechanisms by which D-serine contributes to receptor activation, we performed multi-microsecond molecular dynamics simulations of the GluN1/GluN2A LBD dimer with free D-serine and glutamate agonists. Surprisingly, we observed D-serine binding to both GluN1 and GluN2A LBDs, suggesting that D-serine competes with glutamate for binding to GluN2A. This mechanism is confirmed by our electrophysiology experiments, which show that D-serine is indeed inhibitory at high concentrations. Although free energy calculations indicate that D-serine stabilizes the closed GluN2A LBD, its inhibitory behavior suggests that it either does not remain bound long enough or does not generate sufficient force for ion channel gating. We developed a workflow using pathway similarity analysis to identify groups of residues working together to promote binding. These conformation-dependent pathways were not significantly impacted by the presence of N-linked glycans, which act primarily by interacting with the LBD bottom lobe to stabilize the closed LBD.https://elifesciences.org/articles/77645NMDA receptorglutamate receptorligand bindingmolecular dynamicselectrophysiology
spellingShingle Remy A Yovanno
Tsung Han Chou
Sarah J Brantley
Hiro Furukawa
Albert Y Lau
Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
eLife
NMDA receptor
glutamate receptor
ligand binding
molecular dynamics
electrophysiology
title Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
title_full Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
title_fullStr Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
title_full_unstemmed Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
title_short Excitatory and inhibitory D-serine binding to the NMDA receptor
title_sort excitatory and inhibitory d serine binding to the nmda receptor
topic NMDA receptor
glutamate receptor
ligand binding
molecular dynamics
electrophysiology
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/77645
work_keys_str_mv AT remyayovanno excitatoryandinhibitorydserinebindingtothenmdareceptor
AT tsunghanchou excitatoryandinhibitorydserinebindingtothenmdareceptor
AT sarahjbrantley excitatoryandinhibitorydserinebindingtothenmdareceptor
AT hirofurukawa excitatoryandinhibitorydserinebindingtothenmdareceptor
AT albertylau excitatoryandinhibitorydserinebindingtothenmdareceptor