Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan

This study aimed to clarify the educational significance and issues associated with administering the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) twice to midwifery students, i.e., before and after clinical training. In Sapporo City University in Japan, 37 assessment items of the OSCE were conf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuki Morikawa, Yukari Watanabe, Mayumi Yamauchi, Mayumi Yamamoto, Mamoru Morikawa, Kazumi Ishibiki, Mai Ohtomo, Michiko Miyazaki, Keiko Nakamura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714879/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811190217153970176
author Yuki Morikawa
Yukari Watanabe
Mayumi Yamauchi
Mayumi Yamamoto
Mamoru Morikawa
Kazumi Ishibiki
Mai Ohtomo
Michiko Miyazaki
Keiko Nakamura
author_facet Yuki Morikawa
Yukari Watanabe
Mayumi Yamauchi
Mayumi Yamamoto
Mamoru Morikawa
Kazumi Ishibiki
Mai Ohtomo
Michiko Miyazaki
Keiko Nakamura
author_sort Yuki Morikawa
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to clarify the educational significance and issues associated with administering the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) twice to midwifery students, i.e., before and after clinical training. In Sapporo City University in Japan, 37 assessment items of the OSCE were configured as “Overall,” with 17 items as midwifery’s normal delivery preparation (Part 1) and 20 items as midwifery’s normal delivery assistance (Part 2). All students had attended lectures with textbooks. The first and second OSCEs were conducted before and after the clinical training, respectively. The scores of 54 students were retrospectively analyzed over 6 years (2014–2019). The results of the first and second OSCEs were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test, Fisher’s exact test, and analysis of variance. The mean scores for “Overall” [0–37], “Part 1” [0–17], and “Part 2” [0–20] in the second OSCEs were significantly higher than those in the first OSCE (Overall: 22.7 vs 19.3, Part 1: 9.50 vs 7.71, Part 2: 13.2 vs 11.6, p<0.05, respectively). Regarding “Overall” and “Part 1,” a positive correlation was observed between the first and second OSCEs, wherein the full scores of “Part 1,” converted from 17 to 20 points to match the full scores of “Part 2,” were significantly lower than those of Part 2 (p<0.05, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the scores of the first and second OSCEs in “Part 1” and “Part 2” (p<0.05). The scores increased between the two OSCEs, and participants could objectively grasp the knowledge and skills. The OSCEs conducted twice were useful in skilling-up the normal delivery preparation and assistance skills of midwifery students. However, developing an advanced educational method might be necessary for the midwifery students’ preparation of normal delivery, because the scores in the OSCEs were lower.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:47:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecff39e3cfc74c33be9d2d8229b6c9e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:47:39Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ecff39e3cfc74c33be9d2d8229b6c9e62022-12-22T04:17:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011712Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in JapanYuki MorikawaYukari WatanabeMayumi YamauchiMayumi YamamotoMamoru MorikawaKazumi IshibikiMai OhtomoMichiko MiyazakiKeiko NakamuraThis study aimed to clarify the educational significance and issues associated with administering the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) twice to midwifery students, i.e., before and after clinical training. In Sapporo City University in Japan, 37 assessment items of the OSCE were configured as “Overall,” with 17 items as midwifery’s normal delivery preparation (Part 1) and 20 items as midwifery’s normal delivery assistance (Part 2). All students had attended lectures with textbooks. The first and second OSCEs were conducted before and after the clinical training, respectively. The scores of 54 students were retrospectively analyzed over 6 years (2014–2019). The results of the first and second OSCEs were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test, Fisher’s exact test, and analysis of variance. The mean scores for “Overall” [0–37], “Part 1” [0–17], and “Part 2” [0–20] in the second OSCEs were significantly higher than those in the first OSCE (Overall: 22.7 vs 19.3, Part 1: 9.50 vs 7.71, Part 2: 13.2 vs 11.6, p<0.05, respectively). Regarding “Overall” and “Part 1,” a positive correlation was observed between the first and second OSCEs, wherein the full scores of “Part 1,” converted from 17 to 20 points to match the full scores of “Part 2,” were significantly lower than those of Part 2 (p<0.05, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the scores of the first and second OSCEs in “Part 1” and “Part 2” (p<0.05). The scores increased between the two OSCEs, and participants could objectively grasp the knowledge and skills. The OSCEs conducted twice were useful in skilling-up the normal delivery preparation and assistance skills of midwifery students. However, developing an advanced educational method might be necessary for the midwifery students’ preparation of normal delivery, because the scores in the OSCEs were lower.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714879/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Yuki Morikawa
Yukari Watanabe
Mayumi Yamauchi
Mayumi Yamamoto
Mamoru Morikawa
Kazumi Ishibiki
Mai Ohtomo
Michiko Miyazaki
Keiko Nakamura
Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
PLoS ONE
title Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
title_full Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
title_fullStr Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
title_short Educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training: A longitudinal single university study during 2014–2019 in Japan
title_sort educational significance and challenges of conducting the objective structured clinical examination twice for midwifery students before and after clinical training a longitudinal single university study during 2014 2019 in japan
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714879/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT yukimorikawa educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT yukariwatanabe educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT mayumiyamauchi educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT mayumiyamamoto educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT mamorumorikawa educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT kazumiishibiki educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT maiohtomo educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT michikomiyazaki educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan
AT keikonakamura educationalsignificanceandchallengesofconductingtheobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationtwiceformidwiferystudentsbeforeandafterclinicaltrainingalongitudinalsingleuniversitystudyduring20142019injapan