Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing
The objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and proces...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735/full |
| _version_ | 1818218060985663488 |
|---|---|
| author | Jaroslaw Bilinski Mikolaj Dziurzynski Pawel Grzesiowski Edyta Podsiadly Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel Tomasz Dzieciatkowski Karol Lis Martyna Tyszka Krzysztof Ozieranski Łukasz Dziewit Grzegorz W. Basak |
| author_facet | Jaroslaw Bilinski Mikolaj Dziurzynski Pawel Grzesiowski Edyta Podsiadly Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel Tomasz Dzieciatkowski Karol Lis Martyna Tyszka Krzysztof Ozieranski Łukasz Dziewit Grzegorz W. Basak |
| author_sort | Jaroslaw Bilinski |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and processed) is equipotent to classical fresh FMT preparation. For that, three complementary methods were applied, including: (i) culturing in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, (ii) measuring viability by flow cytometry, and (iii) next-generation sequencing. Flow cytometry with cell staining showed that the applied freezing protocol causes significant changes in all of the observed bacterial fractions. Alive cell counts dropped four times, from around 70% to 15%, while the other two fractions, dead and unknown cell counts quadrupled and doubled, with the unknown fraction becoming the dominant one, with an average contribution of 57.47% per sample. It will be very interesting to uncover what this unknown fraction is (e.g., bacterial spores), as this may change our conclusions (if these are spores, the viability could be even higher after freezing). Freezing had a huge impact on the structure of cultivable bacterial communities. The biggest drop after freezing in the number of cultivable species was observed for Actinobacteria and Bacilli. In most cases, selected biodiversity indices were slightly lower for frozen samples. PCoA visualization built using weighted UniFrac index showed no donor-wise clusters, but a clear split between fresh and frozen samples. This split can be in part attributed to the changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales orders. Our results clearly show that whole stool freezing without any cryoprotectants has a great impact on the cultivability and biodiversity of the bacterial community, and possibly also on the viability of bacterial cells. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T07:17:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f0103c541a474df9947a15b80df58e8e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-302X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T07:17:46Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Microbiology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f0103c541a474df9947a15b80df58e8e2022-12-22T00:33:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2022-07-011310.3389/fmicb.2022.872735872735Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation SequencingJaroslaw Bilinski0Mikolaj Dziurzynski1Pawel Grzesiowski2Edyta Podsiadly3Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel4Tomasz Dzieciatkowski5Karol Lis6Martyna Tyszka7Krzysztof Ozieranski8Łukasz Dziewit9Grzegorz W. Basak10Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandFoundation for the Infection Prevention Institute, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics and Clinical Immunology of Developmental Age, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Microbiology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandThe objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and processed) is equipotent to classical fresh FMT preparation. For that, three complementary methods were applied, including: (i) culturing in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, (ii) measuring viability by flow cytometry, and (iii) next-generation sequencing. Flow cytometry with cell staining showed that the applied freezing protocol causes significant changes in all of the observed bacterial fractions. Alive cell counts dropped four times, from around 70% to 15%, while the other two fractions, dead and unknown cell counts quadrupled and doubled, with the unknown fraction becoming the dominant one, with an average contribution of 57.47% per sample. It will be very interesting to uncover what this unknown fraction is (e.g., bacterial spores), as this may change our conclusions (if these are spores, the viability could be even higher after freezing). Freezing had a huge impact on the structure of cultivable bacterial communities. The biggest drop after freezing in the number of cultivable species was observed for Actinobacteria and Bacilli. In most cases, selected biodiversity indices were slightly lower for frozen samples. PCoA visualization built using weighted UniFrac index showed no donor-wise clusters, but a clear split between fresh and frozen samples. This split can be in part attributed to the changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales orders. Our results clearly show that whole stool freezing without any cryoprotectants has a great impact on the cultivability and biodiversity of the bacterial community, and possibly also on the viability of bacterial cells.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735/fullfecal microbiota transplantationconservationgut microbiotaculturingnext-generation sequencingflow cytometry |
| spellingShingle | Jaroslaw Bilinski Mikolaj Dziurzynski Pawel Grzesiowski Edyta Podsiadly Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel Tomasz Dzieciatkowski Karol Lis Martyna Tyszka Krzysztof Ozieranski Łukasz Dziewit Grzegorz W. Basak Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing Frontiers in Microbiology fecal microbiota transplantation conservation gut microbiota culturing next-generation sequencing flow cytometry |
| title | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
| title_full | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
| title_fullStr | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
| title_short | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
| title_sort | fresh versus frozen stool for fecal microbiota transplantation assessment by multimethod approach combining culturing flow cytometry and next generation sequencing |
| topic | fecal microbiota transplantation conservation gut microbiota culturing next-generation sequencing flow cytometry |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jaroslawbilinski freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT mikolajdziurzynski freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT pawelgrzesiowski freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT edytapodsiadly freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT annastelmaszczykemmel freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT tomaszdzieciatkowski freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT karollis freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT martynatyszka freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT krzysztofozieranski freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT łukaszdziewit freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT grzegorzwbasak freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing |