The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes

The aims of this study were twofold: (i) to examine differences in physical activity (PA) variables regarding the length of Physical Education (PE) lessons (45 vs. 90 min) and teaching methodology (Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) or hybrid TGfU-sports education (SE)); and (ii) to estimate th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Élvio Rúbio Gouveia, Jorge Lizandra, Diogo V. Martinho, Cíntia França, Andreas Ihle, Hugo Sarmento, Hélio Antunes, Ana Luísa Correia, Helder Lopes, Adilson Marques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/12/1790
_version_ 1797460912576135168
author Élvio Rúbio Gouveia
Jorge Lizandra
Diogo V. Martinho
Cíntia França
Andreas Ihle
Hugo Sarmento
Hélio Antunes
Ana Luísa Correia
Helder Lopes
Adilson Marques
author_facet Élvio Rúbio Gouveia
Jorge Lizandra
Diogo V. Martinho
Cíntia França
Andreas Ihle
Hugo Sarmento
Hélio Antunes
Ana Luísa Correia
Helder Lopes
Adilson Marques
author_sort Élvio Rúbio Gouveia
collection DOAJ
description The aims of this study were twofold: (i) to examine differences in physical activity (PA) variables regarding the length of Physical Education (PE) lessons (45 vs. 90 min) and teaching methodology (Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) or hybrid TGfU-sports education (SE)); and (ii) to estimate the percentage of time spent in moderate-to-vigorous (MV) PA assessed via an accelerometer based on total step count, BMI, age, and sex, considering the pedagogical models and the class length. This study was carried out in three classes of invasion games in PE. Two classes were taught based on TGfU (44 students, 18 males, 12.6 ± 0.55), and one was taught based on a hybrid TGfU-SE (17 students, 9 males, 13.7 ± 0.90). The same students were assessed twice, first in a 45 min class and then in a 90 min class. The students’ MVPA was assessed using the Actigraph GT3X Activity Monitor. The results revealed significant differences in PA intensity regarding the length of the PE lesson (45 vs. 90 min) and the teaching methodology. The 45 min classes using TGfU were more intense and had less sedentary time than the 90 min classes. When using a hybrid TGfU-SE, the 90 min classes had higher intensities than the 45 min classes. Generally, when comparing the two types of pedagogical intervention, the TGfU model provided more active lessons and less sedentary time in class than a hybrid TGfU-SE. The TGfU model is more profitable for increasing MVPA in class. Due to the issues related to the organization and management of sports practice in class, several recommendations for maximizing MVPA in a hybrid TGfU-SE class must be considered.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:12:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f220a30eaf194ef2ab0cb360c7852c1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:12:53Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Children
spelling doaj.art-f220a30eaf194ef2ab0cb360c7852c1f2023-11-24T13:59:50ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672022-11-01912179010.3390/children9121790The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education ClassesÉlvio Rúbio Gouveia0Jorge Lizandra1Diogo V. Martinho2Cíntia França3Andreas Ihle4Hugo Sarmento5Hélio Antunes6Ana Luísa Correia7Helder Lopes8Adilson Marques9Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, PortugalDepartment of Teaching of Physical Education, Artistic and Music of the University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainUniversity of Coimbra, Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, 3004-504 Coimbra, PortugalDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, PortugalCenter for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandUniversity of Coimbra, Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, 3004-504 Coimbra, PortugalDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, PortugalDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, PortugalDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, PortugalInterdisciplinary Centre for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, 1495-751 Lisbon, PortugalThe aims of this study were twofold: (i) to examine differences in physical activity (PA) variables regarding the length of Physical Education (PE) lessons (45 vs. 90 min) and teaching methodology (Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) or hybrid TGfU-sports education (SE)); and (ii) to estimate the percentage of time spent in moderate-to-vigorous (MV) PA assessed via an accelerometer based on total step count, BMI, age, and sex, considering the pedagogical models and the class length. This study was carried out in three classes of invasion games in PE. Two classes were taught based on TGfU (44 students, 18 males, 12.6 ± 0.55), and one was taught based on a hybrid TGfU-SE (17 students, 9 males, 13.7 ± 0.90). The same students were assessed twice, first in a 45 min class and then in a 90 min class. The students’ MVPA was assessed using the Actigraph GT3X Activity Monitor. The results revealed significant differences in PA intensity regarding the length of the PE lesson (45 vs. 90 min) and the teaching methodology. The 45 min classes using TGfU were more intense and had less sedentary time than the 90 min classes. When using a hybrid TGfU-SE, the 90 min classes had higher intensities than the 45 min classes. Generally, when comparing the two types of pedagogical intervention, the TGfU model provided more active lessons and less sedentary time in class than a hybrid TGfU-SE. The TGfU model is more profitable for increasing MVPA in class. Due to the issues related to the organization and management of sports practice in class, several recommendations for maximizing MVPA in a hybrid TGfU-SE class must be considered.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/12/1790teaching games for understandingsport education modelinstruction modelphysical activityphysical education
spellingShingle Élvio Rúbio Gouveia
Jorge Lizandra
Diogo V. Martinho
Cíntia França
Andreas Ihle
Hugo Sarmento
Hélio Antunes
Ana Luísa Correia
Helder Lopes
Adilson Marques
The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
Children
teaching games for understanding
sport education model
instruction model
physical activity
physical education
title The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
title_full The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
title_fullStr The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
title_short The Impact of Different Pedagogical Models on Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity in Physical Education Classes
title_sort impact of different pedagogical models on moderate to vigorous physical activity in physical education classes
topic teaching games for understanding
sport education model
instruction model
physical activity
physical education
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/12/1790
work_keys_str_mv AT elviorubiogouveia theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT jorgelizandra theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT diogovmartinho theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT cintiafranca theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT andreasihle theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT hugosarmento theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT helioantunes theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT analuisacorreia theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT helderlopes theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT adilsonmarques theimpactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT elviorubiogouveia impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT jorgelizandra impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT diogovmartinho impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT cintiafranca impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT andreasihle impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT hugosarmento impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT helioantunes impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT analuisacorreia impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT helderlopes impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses
AT adilsonmarques impactofdifferentpedagogicalmodelsonmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivityinphysicaleducationclasses