Potential types of bias when estimating causal effects in environmental research and how to interpret them
Abstract To inform environmental policy and practice, researchers estimate effects of interventions/exposures by conducting primary research (e.g., impact evaluations) or secondary research (e.g., evidence reviews). If these estimates are derived from poorly conducted/reported research, then they co...
Main Authors: | Ko Konno, James Gibbons, Ruth Lewis, Andrew S Pullin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Environmental Evidence |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-024-00324-7 |
Similar Items
-
Minimizing policy-biased appraisals of the evidence on cannabis and psychosis
by: Wayne Hall
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Reducing bias in experimental ecology through directed acyclic graphs
by: Suchinta Arif, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Quantitative probing: Validating causal models with quantitative domain knowledge
by: Grünbaum Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Warranting the use of causal claims
by: Menno Rol, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01) -
Conflicts of interest in randomised controlled surgical trials: systematic review and qualitative and quantitative analysis
by: Probst Pascal, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)