Close to open-Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education.
The Open Science (OS) movement is rapidly gaining traction among policy-makers, research funders, scientific journals and individual scientists. Despite these tendencies, the pace of implementing OS throughout the scientific process and across the scientific community remains slow. Thus, a better un...
Main Authors: | Christian B Strømme, A Kelly Lane, Aud H Halbritter, Elizabeth Law, Chloe R Nater, Erlend B Nilsen, Grace D Boutouli, Dagmar D Egelkraut, Richard J Telford, Vigdis Vandvik, Sehoya H Cotner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278339 |
Similar Items
-
Transplants, Open Top Chambers (OTCs) and Gradient Studies Ask Different Questions in Climate Change Effects Studies
by: Yan Yang, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Next‐generation field courses: Integrating Open Science and online learning
by: Sonya R. Geange, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Gender gaps in the performance of Norwegian biology students: the roles of test anxiety and science confidence
by: Sehoya Cotner, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Intraspecific Trait Variation and Phenotypic Plasticity Mediate Alpine Plant Species Response to Climate Change
by: Jonathan J. Henn, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
by: Sadie Hebert, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)