Effect of Three Post-Harvest Methods at Different Altitudes on the Organoleptic Quality of <i>C. canephora</i> Coffee

<i>C. canephora</i> (syn. <i>C. robusta</i>) is distinctive due to its rising industrial value and pathogen resistance. Both altitude and post-harvest methods influence coffee cup quality; however, modest information is known about this coffee species. Therefore, the aim of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofía Velásquez, Carlos Banchón, Willian Chilán, José Guerrero-Casado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Beverages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/8/4/83
Description
Summary:<i>C. canephora</i> (syn. <i>C. robusta</i>) is distinctive due to its rising industrial value and pathogen resistance. Both altitude and post-harvest methods influence coffee cup quality; however, modest information is known about this coffee species. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between four different altitudes and post-harvest processes (dry, honey, and wet) to the improvement of the organoleptic quality of the <i>C. canephora</i> congolensis and conilon drink. For dry processing, congolensis and conilon showed the lowest scores in terms of fragrance/aroma, flavour, aftertaste, salt–acid, bitter–sweet, and body. Above 625 m, coffees from dry, honey, and wet processes increased scores in their sensory attributes, but there was no difference at such high altitudes when comparing post-harvest samples. Dry-processed coffee samples had total scores over 80 points at high altitudes. Conilon was perceived to have the best sensory attributes at high altitudes using honey processing. In general, the wet-processed congolensis and conilon samples had a tastier profile than dry-processed ones.
ISSN:2306-5710