Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)

A comprehensive method for evaluating kernel quality was established by estimating in detail the kernel quality of 27 pecan cultivars introduced into China and by exploring the major trait differences among the different cultivars of pecan. The contents of crude fat, crude protein, soluble sugar, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuang Wu, Xiaohua Yao, Kailiang Wang, Shuiping Yang, Huadong Ren, Mei Huang, Jun Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/5/746
_version_ 1797499875490791424
author Shuang Wu
Xiaohua Yao
Kailiang Wang
Shuiping Yang
Huadong Ren
Mei Huang
Jun Chang
author_facet Shuang Wu
Xiaohua Yao
Kailiang Wang
Shuiping Yang
Huadong Ren
Mei Huang
Jun Chang
author_sort Shuang Wu
collection DOAJ
description A comprehensive method for evaluating kernel quality was established by estimating in detail the kernel quality of 27 pecan cultivars introduced into China and by exploring the major trait differences among the different cultivars of pecan. The contents of crude fat, crude protein, soluble sugar, and tannin; the fatty acid composition; the amino acid composition; and the mineral element composition of 27 pecan cultivars were analyzed and tested using the national standards for principal component analysis (PCA), and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to comprehensively evaluate the 34 characteristic indicators. The fatty acids in the kernel were dominated by unsaturated fats, with oleic acid having the highest content relative to linoleic acid; the amino acid composition was dominated by medicinal amino acids; and potassium, magnesium, and calcium were the predominant mineral elements. Systematic cluster analysis revealed that the 27 pecan cultivars could be classified into three categories (relatively optimal, general, and poorest kernel quality) and 21 indexes, including oleic, linoleic, linolenic, crude fat, soluble sugars, aspartic acid, and threonine, served as indexes of the differences among the 27 tested cultivars. Combined with principal component analysis and stepwise regression analysis, a kernel quality evaluation model was established and verified, and reliable evaluation results were obtained. In addition, Nos. 9, 65, 66, 72, 8, and 21, which had the best quality, were further ranked using the probability ranking method within the third category of optimal quality cultivars. There were obvious differences in kernel characteristics among the different cultivars of pecan. Six cultivars with potential to be developed into excellent cultivars were preliminarily screened out. It was found that the organic combination of cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis can provide a reliable method for the quality evaluation of pecans.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:53:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f68fc6d582ef47e886fa7392d63e5efc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:53:43Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-f68fc6d582ef47e886fa7392d63e5efc2023-11-23T11:02:07ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072022-05-0113574610.3390/f13050746Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)Shuang Wu0Xiaohua Yao1Kailiang Wang2Shuiping Yang3Huadong Ren4Mei Huang5Jun Chang6Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing 400715, ChinaResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, Hangzhou 311400, ChinaA comprehensive method for evaluating kernel quality was established by estimating in detail the kernel quality of 27 pecan cultivars introduced into China and by exploring the major trait differences among the different cultivars of pecan. The contents of crude fat, crude protein, soluble sugar, and tannin; the fatty acid composition; the amino acid composition; and the mineral element composition of 27 pecan cultivars were analyzed and tested using the national standards for principal component analysis (PCA), and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to comprehensively evaluate the 34 characteristic indicators. The fatty acids in the kernel were dominated by unsaturated fats, with oleic acid having the highest content relative to linoleic acid; the amino acid composition was dominated by medicinal amino acids; and potassium, magnesium, and calcium were the predominant mineral elements. Systematic cluster analysis revealed that the 27 pecan cultivars could be classified into three categories (relatively optimal, general, and poorest kernel quality) and 21 indexes, including oleic, linoleic, linolenic, crude fat, soluble sugars, aspartic acid, and threonine, served as indexes of the differences among the 27 tested cultivars. Combined with principal component analysis and stepwise regression analysis, a kernel quality evaluation model was established and verified, and reliable evaluation results were obtained. In addition, Nos. 9, 65, 66, 72, 8, and 21, which had the best quality, were further ranked using the probability ranking method within the third category of optimal quality cultivars. There were obvious differences in kernel characteristics among the different cultivars of pecan. Six cultivars with potential to be developed into excellent cultivars were preliminarily screened out. It was found that the organic combination of cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis can provide a reliable method for the quality evaluation of pecans.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/5/746<i>Carya illinoinensis</i>cluster analysisprincipal component analysisorthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysiscomprehensive evaluationnutrients
spellingShingle Shuang Wu
Xiaohua Yao
Kailiang Wang
Shuiping Yang
Huadong Ren
Mei Huang
Jun Chang
Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
Forests
<i>Carya illinoinensis</i>
cluster analysis
principal component analysis
orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis
comprehensive evaluation
nutrients
title Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
title_full Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
title_fullStr Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
title_full_unstemmed Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
title_short Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits from Different Cultivars of Pecan (<i>Carya illinoinensis</i> (Wangenheim) K. Koch)
title_sort quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruits from different cultivars of pecan i carya illinoinensis i wangenheim k koch
topic <i>Carya illinoinensis</i>
cluster analysis
principal component analysis
orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis
comprehensive evaluation
nutrients
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/5/746
work_keys_str_mv AT shuangwu qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT xiaohuayao qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT kailiangwang qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT shuipingyang qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT huadongren qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT meihuang qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch
AT junchang qualityanalysisandcomprehensiveevaluationoffruitsfromdifferentcultivarsofpecanicaryaillinoinensisiwangenheimkkoch