Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment

We investigate the environmental impacts of on-board (based on alternating current, AC) and off-board (based on direct current, DC) charging concepts for electric vehicles using Life Cycle Assessment and considering a maximum charging power of 22 kW (AC) and 50 kW (DC). Our results show that the man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona Kabus, Lars Nolting, Benedict J. Mortimer, Jan C. Koj, Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, Rik W. De Doncker, Aaron Praktiknjo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6508
_version_ 1797545211587461120
author Mona Kabus
Lars Nolting
Benedict J. Mortimer
Jan C. Koj
Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs
Rik W. De Doncker
Aaron Praktiknjo
author_facet Mona Kabus
Lars Nolting
Benedict J. Mortimer
Jan C. Koj
Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs
Rik W. De Doncker
Aaron Praktiknjo
author_sort Mona Kabus
collection DOAJ
description We investigate the environmental impacts of on-board (based on alternating current, AC) and off-board (based on direct current, DC) charging concepts for electric vehicles using Life Cycle Assessment and considering a maximum charging power of 22 kW (AC) and 50 kW (DC). Our results show that the manufacturing of chargers provokes the highest contribution to environmental impacts of the production phase. Within the chargers, the filters could be identified as main polluters for all power levels. When comparing the results on a system level, the DC system causes less environmental impact than the AC system in all impact categories. In our diffusion scenarios for electric vehicles, annual emission reductions of up to 35 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq. could be achieved when the DC system is used instead of the AC system. In addition to the environmental assessment, we examine economic effects. Here, we find annual savings of up to 8.5 million euros, when the DC system is used instead of the AC system.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:12:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f909855b269141058d81c42846136a11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:12:15Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-f909855b269141058d81c42846136a112023-11-21T00:05:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-12-011324650810.3390/en13246508Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle AssessmentMona Kabus0Lars Nolting1Benedict J. Mortimer2Jan C. Koj3Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs4Rik W. De Doncker5Aaron Praktiknjo6Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, GermanyInstitute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyInstitute for Power Generation and Storage Systems (PGS), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research–Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE), 52425 Jülich, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research–Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE), 52425 Jülich, GermanyInstitute for Power Generation and Storage Systems (PGS), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyInstitute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, GermanyWe investigate the environmental impacts of on-board (based on alternating current, AC) and off-board (based on direct current, DC) charging concepts for electric vehicles using Life Cycle Assessment and considering a maximum charging power of 22 kW (AC) and 50 kW (DC). Our results show that the manufacturing of chargers provokes the highest contribution to environmental impacts of the production phase. Within the chargers, the filters could be identified as main polluters for all power levels. When comparing the results on a system level, the DC system causes less environmental impact than the AC system in all impact categories. In our diffusion scenarios for electric vehicles, annual emission reductions of up to 35 million kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq. could be achieved when the DC system is used instead of the AC system. In addition to the environmental assessment, we examine economic effects. Here, we find annual savings of up to 8.5 million euros, when the DC system is used instead of the AC system.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6508charging infrastructureelectric vehiclelife cycle assessmentAC chargingDC chargingeconomic assessment
spellingShingle Mona Kabus
Lars Nolting
Benedict J. Mortimer
Jan C. Koj
Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs
Rik W. De Doncker
Aaron Praktiknjo
Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
Energies
charging infrastructure
electric vehicle
life cycle assessment
AC charging
DC charging
economic assessment
title Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
title_full Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
title_fullStr Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Environmental Impacts of Charging Concepts for Battery Electric Vehicles: A Comparison of On-Board and Off-Board Charging Systems Based on a Life Cycle Assessment
title_sort environmental impacts of charging concepts for battery electric vehicles a comparison of on board and off board charging systems based on a life cycle assessment
topic charging infrastructure
electric vehicle
life cycle assessment
AC charging
DC charging
economic assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6508
work_keys_str_mv AT monakabus environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT larsnolting environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT benedictjmortimer environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT janckoj environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT wilhelmkuckshinrichs environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT rikwdedoncker environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment
AT aaronpraktiknjo environmentalimpactsofchargingconceptsforbatteryelectricvehiclesacomparisonofonboardandoffboardchargingsystemsbasedonalifecycleassessment